Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bell, 412 So. 2d 1335.

52 citing documents.

State v. Davis 908 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Smith 903 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. McLaurin, 32,708 (La.App.
State v. White 867 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
P. art. 881.2(A)(2); State v. Young, 96-0195 (La.10/15/96), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir.12/07/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.06/16/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Martin 839 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Alexander, 34,328 (La.
State v. Wyatt 821 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Alexander, 34,328 (La.App.2d Cir.12/06/00), ; State v. Moore, 32,707 (La.App.2d Cir.10/27/99), , writ denied, 01-0650 (La.11/02/01), ; (La.App.
State v. Rutledge 792 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Alexander 774 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Moore, 32,707 (La.
State v. Carter 772 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Moore 743 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. McLaurin 743 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Silvie 721 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
It has been held by the supreme court that where there is a specific sentence agreed upon in a plea bargain, “that sentence cannot be appealed as excessive and there is no need for the trial judge to give reasons for the sentence_”
State v. Young 680 So. 2d 1171 La. 1996
1982) (stating this court will consider excessiveness of plea agreements whereby a sentencing cap is agreed upon); (same).
State v. Brown 665 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Wright 664 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
bars a defendant from seeking review of a sentence imposed in conformity with a plea agreement which was set forth in the record at the time of the plea.
State v. Bradford 627 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Green 598 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Vail 571 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Bevley 569 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Ratcliff 564 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Lewis 564 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Serrano 563 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
the Supreme Court ruled that “where a specific sentence has been agreed to as a consequence of a plea bargain, that sentence cannot be appealed as excessive and there is no need for the trial judge to give reasons for the sentence as required by Article 894.1.” See also, State v. Thibodeaux, 548 So.2d
State v. Washington 557 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Head 556 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Richardson 550 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Banks 551 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Trichel 535 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Bonnett 535 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Boissiere 523 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Jefferson 524 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Bell 524 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Wright 517 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Prejean 520 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Cummings 500 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Alfonso 496 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Cotton 471 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Carter 460 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Broussard 457 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Michael 454 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Although the jurisprudence permits an appeal of the sentence imposed, despite the entry of a plea of guilty, that “where a specific sentence has been agreed to as a consequence of a plea bargain, that sentence cannot be appealed as excessive and there is no need for the trial judge to give reasons for the sentence as required by Article 894.1_” This court has recently subscribed to that position in State v.
State v. Blanchard 450 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the court held that where a specific sentence has been agreed to as a consequence of a plea bargain, such sentence cannot be appealed as excessive and there is no need for a trial judge to give reasons for the sentence.
State v. Coats 449 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
held that "where a specific sentence has been agreed to as a consequence of a plea bargain, that sentence cannot be appealed as excessive and there is no need for the trial judge to give reasons for the sentence as required by Article 894.1, "
State v. Meredith 447 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
stodial environment as it might help him.” Paragraph A(2) of Art. 894.1 reads: “When a defendant has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor, the court should impose a sentence of imprisonment if: “(2) The defendant is in need of correctional treatment or a custodial environment that can be provided most effectively by his commitment to an institution.” Finally, (La.
State v. Dickerson 446 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Murdock 438 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The Supreme Court has held that: “[w]here a specific sentence has been agreed to as a consequence of a plea bargain, that sentence cannot be appealed as excessive.”
State v. Bell 438 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Lewis 434 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Edwards 434 So. 2d 395 La. 1983
State v. Benton 432 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
The state supreme court, held that the trial judge is relieved of his statutory duty to articulate reasons for sentences, where, as here, the specific sentence has been agreed to as a consequence of plea bargaining.
State v. Brown 427 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Buckenburger 428 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983