Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lawson, 410 So. 2d 1101.

22 citing documents.

State v. Price 140 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Russell 73 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. MARKRAY 35 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Shelton 39 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Ford 957 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Honeycutt 953 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Dodson 942 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Dorthey 623 So. 2d 1276 La. 1993
More importantly, we recognized that the statute "is a valid limitation on the sentencing considerations listed in C.Cr.P.
State v. Carter 610 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
and cases cited therein.
State v. Carouthers 607 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Oliver 526 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Perkins 514 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Allen 478 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Briscoe 471 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Miles 464 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Jones 462 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
15:529.1 which states: “R.S.
State v. Thomas 463 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the court upheld a sentence imposed under the terms of the habitual offender statute in the face of an argument similar to that before the court in this case.
State v. Smith 461 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
In addition, the Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized that the appellate court may “look beyond a colloquy to an expanded record to determine whether voluntary waiver occurred.”
State v. Richardson 459 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Jones 451 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Montero 433 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Age 417 So. 2d 1183 La. 1982