Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Duncan, 420 So. 2d 1105.

915 citing documents.

  • State v. Martinez 552 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Frank 549 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Hill 546 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    4th Cir.1988), writs denied
  • State v. Barrett 544 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Bordelon 538 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Broussard 539 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Branch 539 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Stevens 532 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Mayes 532 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. McDaniel 531 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    the facts and circumstances within the affiant’s knowledge, and those of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient to support a reasonable belief that evidence or contraband may be found at the place to be searched.”
  • State v. Scott 530 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Roebuck 530 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Dugas 527 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Dugas 527 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Pierre 524 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Coulon 525 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Hudgins 519 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Martin 520 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Harris 520 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Wells 517 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    129 , 83 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984)
  • State v. Bunch 510 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Lambert 503 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Laborde 498 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Scott 499 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Sterling 496 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Harper 490 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Fernandez 489 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Cormier 487 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Sonnier 487 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Duncan 478 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) were met.
  • State v. Lee 478 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Cox 474 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Sepulvado 473 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Guidry 472 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Perry 472 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Tassin 472 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Montegut 471 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Stewart 465 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Cook 465 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Simms 465 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Childers 463 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Braxton 458 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Williams 457 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Stewart 451 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    compare State v. Ruffin, supra, note the dissenting opinion by Justice Lemmon, footnote 2
  • State v. Manso 449 So. 2d 480 La. 1984
  • State v. Sewell 448 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Distinguished State v. Dooley 447 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Howard 448 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    the Supreme Court enunciated the general principle that: *154 An allegation of past reliability is not necessarily a sine qua non to sufficiency of probable cause as long as a common sense reading of the affidavit supports the conclusion that the informant is credible and his information is reliable.
  • State v. Morris 444 So. 2d 1200 La. 1984