Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Coleman, 412 So. 2d 532.
-
State of Louisiana v. Demetrice Lewis
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Risin, 02-100 (La.App.
-
State v. Lewis
980 So. 2d 251
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Risin, 02-100 (La.App.
- State v. Craft 870 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
- State v. Comena 843 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Pham 839 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- State v. Sylvester 834 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Hickerson 838 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Kirk 833 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- State v. Young 820 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
State v. Risin
807 So. 2d 1042
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
n. 4 (La.1982), the Supreme Court recognized that detecting marijuana by means of smell does not constitute a search.
-
State v. Wyatt
775 So. 2d 481
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
The court stated: n. 4 (La.1982), the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that detecting marijuana by means of smell does not constitute a search.
-
State v. Niel
671 So. 2d 1111
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
2637 , 77 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983)
-
State v. Fisher
649 So. 2d 604
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
the Supreme Court held that police officers had "permission" to search luggage when three men disclaimed ownership of the luggage and said they had no objection to the luggage being searched.
- State v. Buggs 567 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Madison 535 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
-
State v. Garcia
519 So. 2d 788
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
n. 4 (La.1982), the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that detecting marijuana by means of smell does not constitute a search.
-
Blood v. State, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries
458 So. 2d 1006
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Cardwell v. Lewis, 417 U.S. 583 , 94 S.Ct.
-
State v. Ossey
446 So. 2d 280
La. 1984
(tip from police in Miami in addition to the profile); (facts showed probable cause to arrest and there was consent to the search).
- State v. Doucet 420 So. 2d 953 La. 1982
-
State v. Watson
416 So. 2d 919
La. 1982
this Court found that the defendants were under arrest.