Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Coleman, 412 So. 2d 532.

21 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Demetrice Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Risin, 02-100 (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 980 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Risin, 02-100 (La.App.
  • State v. Craft 870 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Comena 843 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Pham 839 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Sylvester 834 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Hickerson 838 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Kirk 833 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Young 820 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Risin 807 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    n. 4 (La.1982), the Supreme Court recognized that detecting marijuana by means of smell does not constitute a search.
  • State v. Wyatt 775 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    The court stated: n. 4 (La.1982), the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that detecting marijuana by means of smell does not constitute a search.
  • State v. Niel 671 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    2637 , 77 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983)
  • State v. Fisher 649 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    the Supreme Court held that police officers had "permission" to search luggage when three men disclaimed ownership of the luggage and said they had no objection to the luggage being searched.
  • State v. Buggs 567 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Madison 535 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Garcia 519 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    n. 4 (La.1982), the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that detecting marijuana by means of smell does not constitute a search.
  • Blood v. State, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries 458 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Cardwell v. Lewis, 417 U.S. 583 , 94 S.Ct.
  • State v. Ossey 446 So. 2d 280 La. 1984
    (tip from police in Miami in addition to the profile); (facts showed probable cause to arrest and there was consent to the search).
  • State v. Doucet 420 So. 2d 953 La. 1982
  • State v. Watson 416 So. 2d 919 La. 1982
    this Court found that the defendants were under arrest.