Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ennis, 414 So. 2d 661.
-
State of Louisiana v. Lisa W. Rabalais
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
2419, 77 L.Ed.2d 1309 (1983); State v. Landry, 38
-
State v. Woods
91 So. 3d 289
La. 2012
It is also specifically governed by this Court’s jurisprudential rule that “mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else.” ( ).
- State ex rel. J.W. 95 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-
State of Louisiana v. Gary Wayne Woods
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
12/19/97), : In Louisiana, the “mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else.”
-
State v. Woods
84 So. 3d 773
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
of his claim that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, appellate counsel cites the following from State v. Chester, 97-1001, pp. 2-3 (La.12/19/97), , 974: In Louisiana, the “mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else.”
-
State of Louisiana v. Zoran Johnson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
12/19/97), the supreme court stated: In Louisiana, the “mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else.”
-
State v. Johnson
28 So. 3d 1263
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Chester, 97-1001, pp. 2-3 (La.12/19/97), , the supreme court stated: In Louisiana, the “mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else.”
- State v. Dell 10 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Harbor 775 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
-
State v. McCadney
761 So. 2d 579
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In State v. Chester, 97-1001 (La.12/19/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court commented on the knowledge element of the crime of possessing stolen things, stating: In Louisiana, the “mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else.”
- State v. Chester 707 So. 2d 973 La. 1997
- State v. Warren 712 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- State v. Elie 567 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
State v. Daigrepont
560 So. 2d 959
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Daniel (La.App.
-
State v. Thomas
538 So. 2d 1021
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
-
State v. Skipper
527 So. 2d 1171
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Honeycutt, 438 So2d 1303 (La.App.
-
State v. Mussall
523 So. 2d 1305
La. 1988
2419 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1309 (1983); State v. Landry, 38
- State v. Mangrum 509 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. St. Romain 505 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Fraley 499 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
- State v. Ellzey 496 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
- State v. Slaughter 451 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
-
State v. Smith
450 So. 2d 679
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
which defendant argues is factually similar and controlling.
- State v. Camp 446 So. 2d 1207 La. 1984
- State v. Burns 441 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Thibodeaux 441 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Jacobs 435 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Oliney 430 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Moore 432 So. 2d 209 La. 1983
- State v. Richardson 425 So. 2d 1228 La. 1983
- State v. Johnson 426 So. 2d 95 La. 1983
- State v. Ruple 426 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983