Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Winn, 412 So. 2d 1337.

55 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lee Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2259, 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986)
State v. Guillory 61 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986)
State v. Hopkins 897 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Shipp 712 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
225 , 83 L.Ed.2d 154 ; writ denied, 463 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct.
State v. Lagrange 702 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Spitz 650 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Grubbs 644 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986)
State v. Duncan 635 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986)
State v. Acevedo 633 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Porter 615 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Aubrey 609 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Martin 595 So. 2d 592 La. 1992
2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986)
State v. Sullivan 596 So. 2d 177 La. 1992
State v. James 592 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Williams 575 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Hatcher 568 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. James 555 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Romero 552 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Arnold 548 So. 2d 920 La. 1989
225 , 83 L.Ed.2d 154 (1984); cert.
State v. Neal 550 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Hallal 544 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Savage 540 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Arnold 535 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
denied, contain the statement that the kidnapping of a person with the intent to commit rape satisfies the requirement that the perpetrator has the intent to force the victim to give up something of value.
State v. Mims 524 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Pierre 524 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Parker 506 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Thomas 504 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Simar v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 483 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Doolittle 482 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
225 , 83 L.Ed.2d 154 (1984)
State v. Evans 482 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Washington 482 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Sonnier, supra; (La.App.
State v. Washington 482 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Sonnier, supra ; (La.App.
State v. Desdunes 477 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Simpson 464 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Washington, *1109 Drew v. United States, 331 F.2d 85 (D.C.Cir.1964); United States v. Weber, 437 F.2d 327 (3d Cir.1970); and La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Yancy 465 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Distinguished State v. Capps 461 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Bacchus 455 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 454 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
This is not a situation where the witness had the opportunity to view the defendant on a number of occasions, over a long period of time, or at a close proximity
State v. Phillips 448 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Cody 446 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Peterson 446 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. McIntyre, supra ; State v. Jones, supra ; c.f.
State v. White 446 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Marx 446 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Marquer 446 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Smith 445 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Rault 445 So. 2d 1203 La. 1984
State v. Kennedy 444 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Burns 441 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Wright 441 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983