Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Barkley, 412 So. 2d 1380.

14 citing documents.

State v. Pierre 131 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See also, (“[A] trial judge’s preconviction offer of a lenient sentence should not be viewed as setting a limit for a justifiable sentence after conviction.”).
State v. Every 35 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Barroso 762 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Nguyen 672 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Pittman 604 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Rubbicco 550 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Molinario 530 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Toussaint 502 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Scott 490 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that “a trial judge’s pre-conviction offer of a lenient sentence should not be viewed as setting a limit for the justifiable sentence after conviction”.
State v. Smith 470 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Hodge 457 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Tuesno 456 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Norman 448 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
See, for *250 example, (twenty-five years); (forty years); (La.
State v. Webb 424 So. 2d 233 La. 1982
art. 704, comments (c), (d); Wright, Federal Practice & Procedure, Criminal, § 225 (1982); West's Federal Practice Manual, § 6754 (1970).