Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ratcliff, 416 So. 2d 528.

416 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jimmy James Mack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Bradley 997 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Mitchell 996 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.
State v. Lilley 996 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.
State v. Jenkins 986 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Joshua, supra , State v. Lane, supra .
State v. FBA 983 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. F.B.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. F.B.A. 983 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Terrance Cotrell Robinson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1317, 152 L.Ed.2d 226 (2002)
State v. Robinson 981 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1317 , 152 L.Ed.2d 226 (2002); *874 (La.
State v. Greer 981 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.2d Cir.9/27/95), .
State v. Johnson 981 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.2d Cir.9/27/95), .
State v. Linn 975 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Lane, 40,816 (La.App.
State v. Parks 977 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Joshua 973 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Robert Thomas Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1317, 152 L.Ed.2d 226 (2002)
State v. Smith 969 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1317 , 152 L.Ed.2d 226 (2002); (La.
State v. Ellis 966 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
*151 (La.1982); State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.
State v. Eiskina 965 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Ross 965 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.2d Cir.9/27/95), .
State v. Gage 965 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Gulley 963 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.
State v. Butler 960 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.
State v. Lang 960 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.2d Cir.9/27/95), .
State of Louisiana v. Michael Brian Maness La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1317, 152 L.Ed.2d 226 (2002)
State v. Estes 956 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Dennis Wayne Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1317, 152 L.Ed.2d 226 (2002)
State v. Baker 956 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1317 , 152 L.Ed.2d 226 (2002); (La.
State v. Grant 954 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Darryl A. Holmes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
This does not mean “errorless counsel [or] counsel judged ineffective by hindsight, but counsel reasonably likely to render effective assistance.”
State v. Guidry 953 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Shirley 945 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.
State v. Wheeler 945 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Willars, 27,-394 (La.App.2d Cir.9/27/95), .
State v. Shirley 945 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Nathan Stringer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
This does not mean “errorless counsel [or] counsel judged ineffective by hindsight, but counsel reasonably likely to render effective assistance.”
State v. Stringer 949 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
1317 , 152 L.Ed.2d 226 (2002)
State v. King 935 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.
State v. King 935 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.
State v. Cooper 935 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Lane 927 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.2d Cir.9/27/95), ; State v. Smith, 25,841 (La.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JENNIFER RENEE ROBERSON A/K/A JENNIFER ROBERTSON A/K/A JENNIFER THOMAS La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
“Effective counsel” has been defined to mean “not errorless counsel”, and not counsel judged ineffective by hindsight, (La.
State v. Roberson 924 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
"Effective counsel" has been defined to mean "not errorless counsel", and not counsel judged ineffective by hindsight, (quoting United States v. Fruge, 495 F.2d 557, 558 (5 Cir.1974)).
State of Louisiana v. Sammie Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Davis 918 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Darwin Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
(quoting United States v. Fruge, 495 F.2d 557, 558 (5 Cir.1974)).
State v. Gauthier 916 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Lee 909 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Willars, 27,394 (La.App.
State v. Morton 910 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Collins 896 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by