Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ratcliff, 416 So. 2d 528.

416 citing documents.

State v. Hatcher 568 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Peterson 561 So. 2d 500 La. 1990
State v. Robinson 563 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Smith 561 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Ross 561 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. *1011 Ratcliff, (La.App.
State v. Sterling 558 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Wille 559 So. 2d 1321 La. 1990
State v. Schmidt 558 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Johnson 557 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Washington 556 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
for the proposition that since ineffectiveness of counsel is also alleged, this assignment should be considered despite the lack of a motion to suppress or objection.
State v. Richardson 550 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Dewhirst 551 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Robinson 549 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Laird 547 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Chavis 542 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Sloan 542 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Junior 542 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Cassell 540 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Guillory 540 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Cases interpreting the law and the standards for appellate sentence review in this state are numerous (), and the rules are clear.
State v. Newton 538 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Messiah 538 So. 2d 175 La. 1988
The reasonableness standard of Myles, supra, at 531 (La.1982), where effective counsel was defined to mean "counsel reasonably likely to render and rendering reasonably effective assistance."
State v. Berry 534 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Langley 534 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Pattillo 534 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Newsome 534 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
the Supreme Court considered assignments despite the lack of objection because of the allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel.
State v. Washington 533 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Washington 533 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Howard 533 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Stevens 532 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Edwards 532 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Clayton 532 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Fontenot 532 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Matthews 532 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Bouie 532 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Johnson 530 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Vinet 529 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Quintero 527 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Dugas 527 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Dugas 527 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Hays 526 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Deville 525 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Gunter 525 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Willis 527 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Oubre 524 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Hammond 526 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Gilmore 522 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Pierre 524 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Effective assistance of counsel does not mean ‘errorless’ counsel, or counsel which may be judged ineffective on mere hindsight, but counsel ‘reasonably likely to render and [actually] rendering reasonably effective assistance.’
State v. Lambert 525 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
the defendant, a first-time felony offender, received a twenty-five-year sentence.
State v. Coulon 525 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988