Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lane, 414 So. 2d 1223.

39 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Kerri Seeney Monic La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Brian L. Pope La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Estes 168 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Defendant argues that the State attempted to “shoe-horn” Deputy Bradley’s questioning of her into the “merely intended for clarification” -26 (La.1982) and State v. Fernandez, 96-2719, when there was nothing that needed clarification.
State v. Wilson 138 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-33 (1984) (in prosecution for first degree murder, “the offense of negligent homicide was not fairly supported by the evidence; and thus the special instruction was not pertinent and need not have been given”)
State v. Cartagena 90 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Addison 8 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Battaglia, 03- 692, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Richthofen 803 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. MM 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. M.M. 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Johnson 778 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Wesley 759 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Hebert 716 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Additionally, the supreme court applied the contemporaneous objection rule to defense counsel's failure to object to the Defendant's absence from an in chambers hearing on the removal of a juror.
State v. Fernandez 712 So. 2d 485 La. 1998
In making this argument, (La.
Voelker v. Miller 613 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Herrin 562 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
NOTES [1] the state submits that the statement was admissible because Det.
State v. Salatich 548 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Amarena 535 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Eaton 524 So. 2d 1194 La. 1988
State v. Flowers 509 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Weiland 505 So. 2d 702 La. 1987
involved an extremely vicious and atrocious murder in the course of which the victim was beaten, raped, mutilated and burned.
State v. McClinton 492 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Dean 487 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Generally, photographs of a homicide victim's body which show the fatal wound are relevant to prove the death, to corroborate other evidence of the cause of death, to establish the location, severity, and number of wounds, and to prove the identity of the victim
State v. Lewis 478 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Carney 476 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Birdsong 452 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Kendig 451 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 450 So. 2d 621 La. 1984
State v. Faulkner 447 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Sawyer v. State 442 So. 2d 1136 La. 1983
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
State v. Reynolds 436 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Lindsey 428 So. 2d 420 La. 1983
[4] State v. Shilling, No. 82-KA-1820 (docketed but not yet set for argument); (a companion to Sawyer ); State v. Riggins, 388 So
State v. Loyd 425 So. 2d 710 La. 1982
State v. Taylor 422 So. 2d 109 La. 1982
[6] State v. Shilling, No. 82-KA-1820 (docketed but not yet set for argument); (a companion to Sawyer); (La.
State v. Sawyer 422 So. 2d 95 La. 1982