Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Latin, 412 So. 2d 1357.

70 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Darren Bridges La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Lonnie B. Kirklin, Jr. A/K/A Lonnie Bernard Kirklin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State v. Trung Le 243 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Latin , , at 1362 (La.1982).
State v. Simms 143 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Mitchell , 2000-1399, p. 5, 779 So.2d at 701 -702 ( Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284 ; ).
State of Louisiana v. Paxton Jules Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Trahan 61 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Paul Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Davis 36 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. White 850 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Addison 788 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Mitchell 779 So. 2d 698 La. 2001
State v. Campbell 778 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Luna 772 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Ball 748 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Nicholas 735 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Borne 691 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Taylor 688 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Camp 641 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Armstrong 626 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Peterson 619 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Lamark 584 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Johnson, 541 So.2d at 822 ; -1363 (La.1982).
State v. Jackson 568 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Robinson 563 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Johnson, 541 So.2d at 822 ; -1363 (La.1982).
State v. Lilly 552 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Spooner 550 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Sergon 539 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Specifically, defendant complains that the State's several references to uncontroverted evidence focused attention on defendant's failure to testify and clearly warranted a (La.
State v. Garcia 541 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
and cases cited therein.
State v. Johnson 541 So. 2d 818 La. 1989
State v. Mullins 537 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Pugh 536 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hill 534 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Washington 533 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Washington 533 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Smith 535 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
the court commented: “References made in closing argument that the State’s case stands uncontro-verted have been frequently upheld by this Court, (citations omitted).
State v. Johnson 525 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hilburn 512 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Comeaux 505 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
or (2) the witness testified exclusively from his past recollection recorded even though he does not have physical possession of the report on the stand.
State v. Burns 504 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Furthermore, the Supreme Court explained that the State is not required to produce police reports of a testifying officer unless (1) the officer has physical possession of the report on the stand and testifies from it; or (2) the officers testified exclusively from his past rec
State v. Guillory 502 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
or (2) the witness testified exclusively from his past recollection recorded even though he does not have physical possession of the report on the stand.
State v. Lowe 485 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
See State v. Smith, supra at 696
State v. Trahan 481 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the Louisiana Supreme Court commented: References made in closing argument that the State's case stands uncontroverted have been frequently upheld by this Court.
State v. Jackson 480 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Murray 476 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Martin 475 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Article 770 provides in part: Upon motion of a defendant, a mistrial shall be ordered when a remark or comment, made within the hearing of the jury by the judge, district attorney, or a court official, during the trial or in argument, refers directly or indirectly to: * * * * * * (3) The failure of the defendant to testify in his own defense; * * * * * * (La.
State v. Davis 474 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Sepcich 473 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Wormser 467 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Mitchell 466 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
held, "The defendant has no absolute right to recall a witness to the stand for further cross-examination.