Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mitchell, 412 So. 2d 1042.
- State v. Martin 472 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
- State v. Jackson 454 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
-
State v. Felo
454 So. 2d 1150
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
The Supreme Court has long held that the purpose of discovery rules as set forth by the Code of Criminal Procedure is to "eliminate unwarranted prejudice which could arise from surprise testimony", especially where the defendant may be lulled into a misapprehension of the strength of the State's case.
- State v. Booth 448 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Faulkner 447 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Marquer 446 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Clark 446 So. 2d 293 La. 1984
- State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Willis 438 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Brooks 434 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Knighton 436 So. 2d 1141 La. 1983
-
State v. Ray
423 So. 2d 1116
La. 1982
State v. Strickland, supra ; cert.