Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Richards, 426 So. 2d 1314.

36 citing documents.

State v. Sandifer 249 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Accord State v. Richards , , 1316 (La.
Ricalde v. Evonik Stockhausen, LLC 202 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
To support this argument, where the Supreme Court upheld a conviction for conspiracy to commit first-degree murder.
State v. Tatum 40 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hinton 6 So. 3d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Jackson 783 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
It may be any act, innocent or illegal, accompanying or following the agreement, which is done in furtherance of its object, and State v. Mayeux, 94-105 (La.App.
State v. Kanost 759 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State ex rel. R.T. 748 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
See 4 Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Pp. 78-79 (Bernard C. Gavit *1261 ed., 1941); Moffett v. State, 96 Nev.
State v. Smith 734 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Smith 737 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State in the Interest of K.H. 725 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Rivers 681 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Ellis, 94-599 (La.App.
State v. Ellis 657 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
426 (1966); State v. Harper, 205 La.
State v. Butler 646 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Mayeux 639 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Lankford 626 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Chatman 599 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Mayeaux 570 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Perez 569 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Chiles 569 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Augustine 555 So. 2d 1331 La. 1990
State v. Hallal 544 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Guillory 540 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
195 , 62 L.Ed.2d 126 (1979)
State v. Coates 509 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Waymire 504 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Holmes 502 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Marks 503 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Farmer 497 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Kihnel 488 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
*1241 Although never having directly addressed the issue now before this court, the Louisiana Supreme Court has consistently indicated that "[t]o constitute the crime [of conspiracy], there must be at least two or more conspirators ...," who form "an agreement to commit a crime ...,"
State v. Augustus 479 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Walker 476 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. White 476 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Bailey 470 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Bennett 454 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Dunn 452 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
States are not presently required by the federal constitution to recognize entrapment as a defense, but almost all have done so with a majority applying the ‘subjective’ approach.” (Emphasis added) quoting State v. Batiste, supra.
State v. Stewart 452 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984