Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hayes, 414 So. 2d 717.
- State v. Landry 502 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Presley 499 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- State v. Koelemay 497 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- State v. Farris 491 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- State v. Moore 490 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
-
State v. Wagster
489 So. 2d 1299
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
this issue was again raised before the Supreme Court in a case which was prosecuted by Ralph Roy.
- State v. Ford 489 So. 2d 1250 La. 1986
-
State v. Bell
477 So. 2d 759
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965)
- State v. Williams 474 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Ketton 468 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Keys 468 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Pupo 466 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Henry 461 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Nolan
457 So. 2d 1246
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the Court noted: [T]he state did not ask the victims or other witnesses whether the offenses occurred in East Baton Rouge Parish.
-
Kikendall v. American Progressive Ins. Co.
457 So. 2d 53
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State In Interest of Clark, (La.App.
- State v. Wilson 454 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Bennett
454 So. 2d 1165
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
at 838 , 13 L.Ed.2d at 774 ; *1180
- State v. Johnson 447 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Watson 449 So. 2d 1321 La. 1984
- State v. Williams 445 So. 2d 1171 La. 1984
- State v. Rault 445 So. 2d 1203 La. 1984
- State v. Kennedy 444 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Washington
441 So. 2d 791
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
To trigger the need for an admonition, “the remark must refer to a crime alleged to have been committed by the defendant.”
- State v. Hill 434 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Harper 430 So. 2d 627 La. 1983
-
State v. Allen
431 So. 2d 808
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
However, under Louisiana jurisprudence a police officer is not considered a "court official", and therefore La.C.Cr.P.
- State v. Barry 428 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983