Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Washington, 414 So. 2d 313.
- State v. Gaines 452 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Shepherd 449 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
- State v. Nelson 449 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Wardlow 448 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Davis 449 So. 2d 452 La. 1984
- State v. Sewell 448 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Palmer 448 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Baker
447 So. 2d 1226
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
at 315, our Supreme Court held that “[t]he source of information from which a sentencing court may draw are extensive, and traditional rules of evidence are not bars to consideration of other relevant information.
- State v. James 447 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Acosta 447 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Ellis 447 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Bethly 449 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Colton 445 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Humphrey 445 So. 2d 1155 La. 1984
-
State v. Barge
444 So. 2d 735
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
The Supreme Court of Louisiana has said, that "...
- State v. Williams 441 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Burns 441 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Moore 442 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Flowers 441 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Brown 440 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Henry 443 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Boutte 441 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Brown 438 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Carpenter 438 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Stone 438 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Cruz
438 So. 2d 1251
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
: “[T]he sources of information from which a sentencing court may draw are extensive, and traditional rules of evidence are not bars to consideration of otherwise relevant information.
-
State v. Rainey
438 So. 2d 1328
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Washington, supra [ ].
- State v. Stoner 438 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. McCarty 438 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Roberts 440 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Horne 438 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Smith 437 So. 2d 252 La. 1983
-
State v. Haney
434 So. 2d 1264
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
See: State v. Fleming, supra.
- State v. Paddie 434 So. 2d 392 La. 1983
- State v. Edwards 432 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Guidroz 432 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Vallare 430 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Duhon
431 So. 2d 120
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
It is settled that the imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may violate a defendant's constitutional right against being subjected to excessive punishment, when a sentence is so excessive or so disproportionate to the severity of the crime as to "shock the sense of justice".
- State v. Marchese 430 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Lewis 430 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Easley 432 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Parker 431 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Toussaint 429 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Fleming 428 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Goodman 427 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Willis
420 So. 2d 962
La. 1982
State v. Spencer, supra ; State v. Sepulvado, supra .
- State v. Moore 419 So. 2d 963 La. 1982
- State v. Burnette 419 So. 2d 835 La. 1982
- State v. Lanclos 419 So. 2d 475 La. 1982