Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thibodeaux, 414 So. 2d 366.
- State of Louisiana v. Reginald Taral Warren La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
-
State v. Warren
239 So. 3d 960
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Thibodeaux , , 368 (La.1982).
- State of Louisiana v. Robert Glen Coleman 188 So. 3d 174 La. 2016
- State v. Graham 820 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
- State v. Butler 812 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
- State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- State v. Fisher 720 So. 2d 1179 La. 1998
-
State v. Amos
714 So. 2d 775
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Further, Hebert explains: our Supreme Court stated: “[w]hether a person has been taken into custody, detained or deprived of his freedom in a significant way must be decided by an objective test.
-
State v. Thomas
683 So. 2d 1272
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed what constitutes an illegal detention: Whether a person has been taken into custody, detained or deprived of his freedom in a significant way must be decided by an objective test.
- State v. Foley 570 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
-
State v. Hebert
559 So. 2d 821
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
our Supreme Court stated: "[w]hether a person has been taken into custody, detained or deprived of his freedom in a significant way must be decided by an objective test.
- State v. Simms 554 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Calhoun
554 So. 2d 127
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed what constitutes an illegal detention: Whether a person has been taken into custody, detained or deprived of his freedom in a significant way must be decided by an objective test.
- State v. Tyler 548 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Massey 535 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Golmon 536 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Guidry 520 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Trent 517 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
-
State v. Obney
505 So. 2d 211
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
held that "[w]hether a person has been taken into custody, detained or deprived of his freedom in any significant way must be decided by an objective test."
-
State v. Green
505 So. 2d 265
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
As the trial court stated: “Whether this defendant went looking for Ed Lopez or didn’t go looking for Ed Lopez or whether he sent his mother to go look for Ed Lopez[,] unless all [of] these facts were communicated tó these officers, and I have no evidence that it was, all of this makes no difference to this hearing.” our Supreme Court stated that: “Conclusions of a trial court on the credibility and weight of testimony relating to the voluntariness of a confession are given great weight and will
-
State v. Freeman
503 So. 2d 753
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
our Supreme Court instructed that: "Whether a person has been taken into custody, detained or deprived of his freedom in a significant way must be decided by an objective test.
- State v. Myers 495 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- State v. Dickinson 492 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Fuller 446 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Tullos 446 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Brown 445 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
- State v. Sterling 444 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Copeland
419 So. 2d 899
La. 1982
2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); see