Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Feeback, 414 So. 2d 1229.

60 citing documents.

State v. Ennis 97 So. 3d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Knighten 968 So. 2d 720 La. 2007
."); ("The very relevant evidence of the other [prior drug sales to an undercover agent] was of great probative value in establishing the essential ingredient of the crime-intent to distribute")(footnote omitted); (state properly charged four counts of distribution and one count of possession with intent to distribute in a single bill of information because "[e]vidence concerning the prior distributions would have been admissible to prove intent to distribute the marijuana.").
State v. Lewis 736 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Evans 715 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Guccione 694 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
where the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a severance was not required simply because a defendant indicates that he wishes to testify on some counts but not on others.
State v. Wilson 672 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Foster, 26143 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/9/94), ; review denied 95-0548 (La.
State v. Foster 647 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Art. 729.5; -35 (La.1982).
State v. Caldwell 616 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Savage 575 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Byrd 568 So. 2d 554 La. 1990
State v. Kidd 568 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
(applying art. 801's predecessor, LSA-R.S.
State v. Dyer 567 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Hunter 563 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Rhodes 552 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Trahan 543 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Martin 543 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
the Supreme Court found that the presence of drug paraphernalia, handguns, note pads, a radio scanner, and a telephone answering machine were either relevant to prove defendant's intent to distribute, or irrelevant, but not of such a prejudicial nature to constitute reversible error.
State v. Pierre 524 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hall 519 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State Ex Rel. Cockerham v. Butler 515 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Parker 506 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Humphreys 499 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Payton 496 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Green 482 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Lopez 484 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Walker 476 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Valovich 472 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the Supreme Court determined the appropriate standard to be utilized when considering whether an item not particularly described in a search warrant has been constitutionally seized.
State v. Rainey 470 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Nance 469 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
a state trooper was allowed to testify as to the subject matter of a conversation he heard in which the participants discussed a drug transaction.
State v. Abram 465 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Johnson 467 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
which was found to establish probable cause, was very similar to that in the present case.
State v. DiMaggio 461 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
limit the reviewing court to the four corners of the search warrant to seek probable cause, the defense avers that the motion to suppress should have been granted.
State v. Hebert 457 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Casimier 454 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
[3] where repetitive questioning was allowed by the trial court where the witness' initial answers were vague and required additional questioning for clarification.
State v. Ceasar 449 So. 2d 1385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Rainwater 448 So. 2d 1387 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Booth 448 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Sewell 448 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Palmer 448 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Knox 450 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. James 447 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Morace 446 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Cody 446 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Lee 446 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Washington 444 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Washington 444 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Mayberry 443 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Johnson 442 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Hebert 443 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Turner 440 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Walton 440 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983