Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mart, 419 So. 2d 1216.

34 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jaylon K. Brown La. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Fitzpatrick P. Williams La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State v. Matthews 200 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Langston, 43,923 (La.App.
State v. Vallo 117 So. 3d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Thomas, 27,507 (La.App.2d Cir.12/6/95), , writ denied, 96-0119 (La.4/8/96), .
State v. Collins 43 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Allen, 94-1941 (La.App.
State v. Turner 32 So. 3d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Langston 3 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Thomas, 27,507 (La.
State v. Mitchell 894 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Roland 850 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
: The contemporaneous objection rule serves two laudable and related purposes.
State v. Mitchell 779 So. 2d 698 La. 2001
State v. Taylor, 93-2201 p. 7 (La.2/28/96), -69 ( cert.
State v. Jackson 768 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Johnson 734 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
the contemporaneous objection rule serves two laudable and related purposes.
State v. Tipton 705 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Taylor 669 So. 2d 364 La. 1996
State *369 v. Arvie, cert.
State v. Guy 669 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Thomas 665 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Berry 630 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Montegut 618 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Even if this court concludes that no contemporaneous objection was made, the defendant argues that the Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized exceptions to the contemporaneous objection rule where the jury instruction contained misstatements of the elements of an offense
State v. Allen 592 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Williams 591 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Williams 591 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Carter 589 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Williams 580 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Dobson, id.; (La.App.
State v. Dobson 578 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Holland 544 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Prince 520 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Kennington 515 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Johnson, 475 So.
State v. LeBlanc 506 So. 2d 1197 La. 1987
State v. Arvie 505 So. 2d 44 La. 1987
State v. Wallace 484 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
for the following proposition: When counsel for defendant fails to comply with the contemporaneous objection rule, even in the case of a fundamentally erroneous instruction on the elements of an offense, it is not unreasonable to require defendant to carry the burden of satisfying this court that the procedu
State v. Nolen 461 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
the Supreme Court of Louisiana discussed at length "...
State v. Bosley 454 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Maes 427 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
2141 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978)
State Ex Rel. Elaire v. Blackburn 424 So. 2d 246 La. 1982
[17] Had defendant assigned as error the substantial (but unobjected to) error committed by the trial court in failing to accurately define the responsive offenses