DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fuller, 414 So. 2d 306.

300 citing documents.

  • State v. Taylor 449 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
  • State v. Mathieu 449 So. 2d 1087 La. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Blunt 449 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Viera 449 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Swift 449 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) a rational trier of fact could have found every element of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Reed 448 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Simpson 447 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Pipkins 447 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Wright 447 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Lamothe 447 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Lewis 449 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Franklin 449 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Palmer 447 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Lawson 446 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781, 2783 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Sosa 446 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Harrison 446 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Sly 443 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Rivers 444 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    15:445; In Interest of Franklin, (La.
  • State v. Smith 445 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Humphrey 445 So. 2d 1155 La. 1984
  • State v. Beck 445 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Lee 446 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Day 444 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Jackson v. Virginia, supra
  • State v. Barber 445 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) : A reviewing court must determine whether, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Boyd 442 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    at 2789 , *1270 61 L.Ed.2d at 573 (Emphasis in the original)
  • State v. Johnson 443 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Mitchell 442 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Johnson 442 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Tobias 441 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Howard 443 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    15:445; In Interest of Franklin
  • State v. Chapman 438 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Buchanan 439 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Daigle 439 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Moore 439 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Donaldson 439 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Hodges 438 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Jackson v. Virginia, supra
  • State v. Hodges 438 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Jackson v. Virginia, supra
  • State v. Lee 436 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), (La.
  • State v. Junak 436 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 *1316 (1979); (La.
  • State v. LaPorte 436 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), is whether a rational trier of fact, accepting the facts in a light most favorable to the prosecution, could have found the defendant guilty of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Rhome 436 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983
  • State v. Paul 433 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), notwithstanding the fact that defendant neither moved for a directed verdict nor a new trial, nor filed formal assignments of error.
  • State v. Coleman 432 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Trevathan 432 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    at 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d at 573 (emphasis in the original)
  • State v. Smith 431 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Rogers 428 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Quebedeaux 424 So. 2d 1009 La. 1982
  • State v. Serrato 424 So. 2d 214 La. 1982
    [10] : "On a motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence, the defendant has the burden to show that the evidence could not have been discovered before or during trial through the exercise of reasonable diligence.