Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 414 So. 2d 1237.

23 citing documents.

State v. Franklin 87 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Carthan 765 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
(emphasis added), the supreme court stated: In a criminal prosecution, the trial court must charge the jury, when properly requested, as to the law applicable to any theory of defense which jurors could reasonably infer from the evidence, but this charge must be supported by the evidence presented at t
State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Bolden 680 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Hidalgo 668 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Bailey 664 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Richardson 648 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Leroux 641 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Jones 544 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
2nd Cir. 1984), writ denied
State v. Freeman 539 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
2nd Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. White 535 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Pier 530 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. St. Romain 505 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Obney 505 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Hobdy 494 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Dean 487 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Brown 452 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
if it does not require qualification, limitation, or explanation, and if it is wholly correct and pertinent; it need not be given if it is included in the general charge or in another special charge which is given.” (citations omitted).
State v. Andrews 451 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Pettaway 450 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Robertson 441 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Kohler 434 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Marchese 430 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983