Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fuller, 418 So. 2d 591.

59 citing documents.

State v. Moore 477 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Peters 468 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
and authorities cited therein.
State v. Smith 463 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
The following cases illustrate cases where specific intent was found necessary for a burglary conviction, although nothing was taken: (La.App.
State v. Davis 463 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Aitch 465 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Patterson 459 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Connors 432 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1969) which held that, "[t]he question we must answer is whether, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found that the essential elements of the crime were proven beyond a reasonable doubt."
State v. Spikes 428 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State ex rel. Maness v. Black 434 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983