DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Parker, 416 So. 2d 545.

89 citing documents.

  • State v. Armstrong 743 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Koon 730 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Lagrange 702 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Bryant 694 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Thompson, 27,512 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/6/95), .
  • State v. Campbell 673 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Thompson 665 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Franklin 648 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( ), to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis ( (La.App.
  • State v. Bibb 626 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    g the expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon , 395 at 774), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Claibon , 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( ), to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis ( , (La.App.
  • State v. Moseley 587 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Jack 554 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Johnson 553 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Barlow 550 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Jackson 548 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    n was offered ( State v. Claibon, supra, at 774 ; State v. Roy, supra, at 669 ), State v. Claibon, supra ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( ), to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis ( State v. Heath, supra, at 576 ), the duration of the expert's contact with the defendant and whether he had interviewed the defendant previous to the offense ( (La.App.
  • State v. Weiland 540 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Richard 525 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Newman 515 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Douget 507 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Lee 498 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Bahm 490 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Graham 486 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Rault 483 So. 2d 141 La. 1986
    the improper prosecutorial remark relating to defendant’s reputation was not addressed to a character witness and Parker had not placed his character at issue.
  • State v. Payne 482 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Life imprisonment is not an unconstitutionally excessive penalty for the crime of second degree murder, even where the accused is a juvenile.
  • State v. Robertson 480 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Green 480 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    14:30.1), and a sentence based upon a plea bargain.
  • State v. McGary 479 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Holbrook 476 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Rice 471 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    14:30.1), and a sentence based upon a plea bargain.
  • State v. Shepard 468 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Callis 466 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Lively 457 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Hogan 454 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Guidry 450 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    However, do appear to be closely analogous to this case.
  • State v. Pettaway 450 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Marquer 446 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 445 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Rault 445 So. 2d 1203 La. 1984
  • State v. James 431 So. 2d 399 La. 1983
  • State v. Trevathan 432 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 5 The sentence meted out to defendant, i.e., life imprisonment without benefit of probation, suspension, or parole, is statutorily mandated and has been held not to constitute cruel and unusual punishment
  • State v. Sims 426 So. 2d 148 La. 1983