Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Huizar, 414 So. 2d 741.

347 citing documents.

  • State v. Lee 742 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Allen 742 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Lewis, supra; State v. Meyers, supra; State v. Hill, 93- *952 405 (La.App.
  • State v. Chirlow 738 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Simmons 738 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Evans 734 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Hill 93-405 (La.App.
  • State v. Pierre 733 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
  • State v. Meads 734 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    the supreme court, held that "[t]he gravamen of the crime of attempted murder, whether first or second degree, is the specific intent to kill and the commission of an overt act tending toward the accomplishment of that goal."
  • State v. Hopson 735 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Lewis 732 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Williams 729 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Winston 723 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Morris 719 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Augustus, 93-406 (La.App.
  • State v. Maxie 719 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Allen 707 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Washington 705 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Washington 705 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Lewis 698 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    State v. Meyers, supra; State v. Hill, 93-405 (La.App.
  • State v. Gay 697 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Guccione 694 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    State v. Martin, 92-811 (La.App.
  • State v. Ingram 688 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    App. 2d Cir.), writ denied, (1986)
  • State v. Tolbird 685 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Meyers 683 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Silva 685 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Louisiana Farms v. LA. Dept. of Wildlife 685 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Sellen 677 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    State v. Knowles, supra; State v. Dean, supra.
  • State v. Hingle 677 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Ellis 677 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    State v. Knowles, supra.
  • State v. Hidalgo 668 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Andrews 665 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. George 661 So. 2d 975 La. 1995
  • State v. Girod 653 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Dunn 651 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Byes 648 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Slang 646 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    App. 5th Cir.1992), writ denied, (
  • State v. Berry 645 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Harris 643 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. DeJesus 642 So. 2d 854 La. 1994
    A bill of particulars may not be used to obtain the state's evidence, and a motion to quash is generally not an appropriate vehicle for raising defenses on the merits.
  • State v. Meyers 643 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Leroux 641 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Martin 638 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Glover 636 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    Such evidence may be used to strengthen the state's original case
  • State v. Augustus 633 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Tate 632 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    See, (citations omitted); , 749 *1219 (La.1982).
  • State v. Wilson 631 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Butler 631 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Foret 628 So. 2d 1116 La. 1993
  • State v. Hawkins 633 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Young 623 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    sets forth the standard in such a situation: Where there is a reasonable likelihood that prejudiced news media publicity prior to trial, will prevent a fair trial, the trial judge should continue the case until the threat abates or he should transfer it to another locality not so permeated with publicit
  • State v. Crawford 619 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993