Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Montana, 421 So. 2d 895.

33 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Willie H. Battle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Morgan 842 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Defense counsel urged the motion following the testimony of the sergeant, arguing that his testimony at the conclusion of the state’s direct examination constituted giving an opinion on an ultimate issue of guilt, the intent to distribute
State v. Ducre 827 So. 2d 1120 La. 2002
1984); in those cases the trial courts overruled defense objections to the contested expert testimony, and thus the respective juries were allowed to consider what should have been inadmissible evidence.
State v. Goldston 804 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Ducre 809 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Johnson 780 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
The defendant argues that this testimony constituted giving an opinion on an ultimate issue of guilt, the intent to distribute, (La.App.
State v. Hollins 742 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Baker 729 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
(the ruling of the trial court will not be disturbed absent manifest error); (La.
State v. Craig 699 So. 2d 865 La. 1997
(the ruling of the trial court will not be disturbed absent manifest error); Art. 702, comment d. Courts will also look to whether a witness has previously been qualified as an expert.
State v. Bell 639 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Trahan 637 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Code 627 So. 2d 1373 La. 1993
State v. Matthews 632 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Raiford 600 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
The defendant argues that this testimony constituted giving an opinion on an ultimate issue of guilt, the intent to distribute, (La.App.
State v. Bosworth 593 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Green 590 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Mitchell 572 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
the Supreme Court held the trial court erred in allowing the expert witness to give an opinion in response to a hypothetical question based on a factual situation similar to that which prevailed in the case.
State v. Tassin 536 So. 2d 402 La. 1988
State v. Jefferson 511 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Valentine 496 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Lowery 491 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Montegut 471 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Lard 459 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Dabney 452 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
1982), (1984), the Louisiana Supreme Court condemned the use of such testimony as a usurpation of the jury's function.
State v. Birdsong 452 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Bailey 452 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
held that, in a prosecution for possession of heroin with intent to distribute, it was proper for an officer to testify concerning the modus operandi of illicit users and distributors of heroin.
State v. White 450 So. 2d 648 La. 1984
State v. Palmer 448 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Barber 445 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
the Court upheld the expert qualification of a police officer who had eight years experience in the N.O.P.D.
State v. Washington 441 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
wherein both convictions were reversed because the officer/experts made conclusory statements on the ultimate issue of guilt usurping thereby the jury’s functions.