Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Anderson, 418 So. 2d 551.

15 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Cory W. Wall La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
  • State v. Becnel 265 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    State v. Anderson , , 552 (La.
  • State v. Fitch 244 So. 3d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    State v. Anderson , , 552 (La.
  • State v. Harrche 81 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Phillips 61 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    | the court held that a purse snatching did not require an actual face-to-face confrontation.
  • State v. Smith 23 So. 3d 291 La. 2009
  • State v. Pierre 869 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    As to the purse being in her control, (La.
  • State v. Boss 848 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Marts 765 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    this wording establishes that the "snatching" element is separate *444 and apart from any "use of force" or "intimidation."
  • State v. Ward 712 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Neville 695 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Mosley 485 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    14.65.1 from the legal definition of the “use of force or intimidation.” (La.App.
  • State v. Capote 474 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Jackson 454 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jackson 439 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    wherein the court apparently allowed the use of a dictionary in defining the word “snatching”.