Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Anderson, 418 So. 2d 551.
- State of Louisiana Versus Cory W. Wall La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
-
State v. Becnel
265 So. 3d 1017
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Anderson , , 552 (La.
-
State v. Fitch
244 So. 3d 855
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Anderson , , 552 (La.
- State v. Harrche 81 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
State v. Phillips
61 So. 3d 130
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
| the court held that a purse snatching did not require an actual face-to-face confrontation.
- State v. Smith 23 So. 3d 291 La. 2009
-
State v. Pierre
869 So. 2d 246
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
As to the purse being in her control, (La.
- State v. Boss 848 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
-
State v. Marts
765 So. 2d 438
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
this wording establishes that the "snatching" element is separate *444 and apart from any "use of force" or "intimidation."
- State v. Ward 712 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
- State v. Neville 695 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
-
State v. Mosley
485 So. 2d 658
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
14.65.1 from the legal definition of the “use of force or intimidation.” (La.App.
- State v. Capote 474 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
- State v. Jackson 454 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Jackson
439 So. 2d 616
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
wherein the court apparently allowed the use of a dictionary in defining the word “snatching”.