Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cobb, 419 So. 2d 1237.

48 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Ronald Lane Smith La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana Versus Eric Richardson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    No jurisprudence could be located and defendant fails to cite to any case where the CI was produced for an in camera interview with the trial 9 (La.
  • State v. Johnson 229 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Whitlock 207 So. 3d 538 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); (La.
  • State v. Harper 53 So. 3d 1263 La. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Kendall Paul Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    2392, 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976)
  • State v. Davis 36 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976)
  • State v. White 1 So. 3d 439 La. 2009
    3469, 3481 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1201 (1983)
  • State v. Smith 936 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976)
  • State v. Tate 880 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976)
  • State v. Herron 879 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    2392, 2399 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976)
  • State v. Johnson 870 So. 2d 995 La. 2004
    the Court found sufficient evidence of a violation of LA.REV.STAT.
  • State v. James 849 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    2392, 2399 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976)
  • State v. Bowie 813 So. 2d 377 La. 2002
    nd Giglio and, if so, order it disclosed); -1331 (La.1982) (error to deny in camera examination of grand jury testimony and statements to police and others by the "chief prosecution witness [whose] testimony went directly to the issue of guilt;" if on remand material inconsistencies carrying impeachment value are found, new trial must be granted); -1242 (La.1982) (error to deny defense access to police radio logs; on remand judge will decide if any are materially inconsistent with officer's acco
  • State v. Lewis 736 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    3 Cir.1989), writ denied
  • State v. Denis 691 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    State *1297 v. Bolden, cert.
  • State v. Hidalgo 668 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963)
  • State v. Woods 654 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Busby 653 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972)
  • State v. Dunn 651 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    art. 723; [2] see also State v. Ates, supra; (La.App.
  • State v. Brossette 634 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972)
  • State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
  • State v. Stills 600 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Young 576 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Stanford 574 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Kidd 568 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972); (La.
  • State v. Livings 548 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Jones 544 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Fayard 537 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Dewhirst 527 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    -44 (La.1982) the court stated: *479 "...
  • State v. Landry 524 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Domingue 507 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972)
  • State v. Smith 504 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); (La.
  • State v. Brian 502 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. McClinton 492 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    United States v. Agurs, supra
  • State v. Williams 489 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Williams 489 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Anderson 478 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Starks 471 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Sanford 465 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held: “The motion for a new trial rests upon the supposition that some injustice has been done, therefore it is incumbent upon the mover to show that this is the case.
  • State v. Harris 444 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Bellows 442 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Leagea 442 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Husband 437 So. 2d 269 La. 1983
  • State v. Jimmerson 432 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Square 433 So. 2d 104 La. 1983
  • State v. Morris 431 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Marler 428 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)