DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sharp, 414 So. 2d 752.

41 citing documents.

  • State v. Wright 931 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Ishmel Joel Ennis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Likewise, Deputy Semmes testified that Mr. Ennis said he was a “three-time loser.” 11
  • State v. Ennis 877 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
  • State v. Iron 780 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Francis 748 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Thibodeaux 687 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Butler 615 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Fann 597 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Granier 592 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Granier 563 So. 2d 1354 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Crocker 551 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Simon 544 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Coutee 545 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Reaux 539 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Fontenot 524 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Price 517 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    ” We conclude that it was more probable than not that the knife was connected with the case and the trial court did not err in allowing its introduction in evidence.
  • State v. Brooks 505 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Williams 479 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Reynolds 473 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that "...
  • State v. Smith 466 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    "[i]f a statement constitutes hearsay, but forms part of the res gestae, it is admissible into evidence."
  • State v. Roy 458 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    the Supreme Court stated: “In order for a conviction to stand, the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, must be sufficient to convince a reasonable trier of fact of the guilt of the defendant, beyond a reasonable doubt, of every element of the crime.
  • State v. Sanford 465 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    our Supreme Court stated: “In order for a conviction to stand, the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, must be sufficient to convince a reasonable trier of fact of the guilt of the defendant, *8 beyond a reasonable doubt, of every element of the crime.” (Citation omitted).
  • State v. Lewis 452 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Crawford 458 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jones 457 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Dunn 454 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Chelette 453 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    our Supreme Court stated: "In order for a conviction to stand, the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, must be sufficient to convince a reasonable trier of fact of the guilt of the defendant, beyond a reasonable doubt, of every element of the crime."
  • State v. Dunn 452 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 453 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Wall 452 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    *226 the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "In Louisiana, the res gestae doctrine is broad and includes not only spontaneous utterances and declarations made before or after the commission of a crime, but also testimony of witnesses and police officers pertaining to what they heard or observed before, during
  • State v. Franklin 449 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Doucet 443 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "In order for a conviction to stand, the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, must be sufficient to convince a reasonable trier of fact of the guilt of the defendant, beyond a reasonable doubt, of every element of the crime.
  • State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Glaze 439 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Ruiz 437 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Craddock 435 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 31 La. 1983
  • State v. Sims 426 So. 2d 148 La. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)