DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Savoy, 418 So. 2d 547.

47 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel E. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana v. Jarrett Andrews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    Compare State v. Savoy, [].
  • State v. Andrews 265 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    Compare State v. Savoy , [ ].
  • Distinguished State v. Lloyd 161 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Finally, which was cited by the defendant.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jerry Steinle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Here, wherein the supreme court acquitted the defendant of second degree murder because the circumstantial evidence did not rebut beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant’s claim of self-defense.
  • State v. Steinle 98 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Here, wherein the supreme court acquitted the defendant of second degree murder because the circumstantial evidence did not rebut beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant’s claim of self-defense.
  • State v. Tillman 7 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Finally, Tillman asserts that his inconsistent statements to the police are not sufficient to support his conviction
  • State ex rel. D.P.B. 817 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    “[N]o one except the defendant will ever know to a moral certainty the truth as to what happened” in the morning hours of October 4, 2000.
  • State v. Reed 809 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Compare State v. Savoy, supra [ ].
  • State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
    The conflicting accounts given by defendant after the murder do not constitute affirmative, substantive evidence of his guilt, but they undoubtedly undercut the reasonableness of the principal defense theory of manslaughter.
  • State v. Carrier 670 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Long 643 So. 2d 132 La. 1994
    Relator's conflicting accounts of her family's finances did not constitute affirmative substantive evidence that she aided and abetted the act charged against her, State v. Williams, supra ; in part because they reflected not only a lack of candor but the same inability to come to grips with the realities of a situation which had led the family into its financial straits in the first place.
  • State v. Williams 633 So. 2d 147 La. 1994
  • State v. Major 604 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    simply mean that such evidence, although admissible to support a "guilty mind", are not alone sufficient to convict.
  • State v. Corkern 593 So. 2d 1259 La. 1992
  • State v. Brown 594 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Thompson 578 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    simply mean that such evidence, although admissible to support a “guilty mind”, are not alone sufficient to convict.
  • State v. Alpaugh 568 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Moore 568 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    in which the defendant's conviction for second degree murder was reversed on the basis of insufficient evidence.
  • State v. Roland 543 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Vance 544 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Stratton 521 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Huddleston 517 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Green 505 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Guirlando 491 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    simply means that such evidence, although admissible to support a "guilty mind", are not alone sufficient to convict.
  • State v. Smith 490 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Brown 486 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Jones 477 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Williams 470 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Green 470 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Garcia 470 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    We are compelled to reverse this conviction because the state could not carry its burden of establishing beyond a and numerous cases cited therein.
  • State v. Necaise 466 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Imbornone 462 So. 2d 1236 La. 1985
    simply mean that such evidence, although admissible to support a 'guilty mind’, are not alone sufficient to convict.” 448 So.2d at 680 and n. 4.
  • State v. Williams 461 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Hart 457 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Bryan 454 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Ducote 452 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Deville 451 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Green 449 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    wherein the Supreme Court conceded that the defendant was a "consumate liar".
  • State v. Freeman 447 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Captville 448 So. 2d 676 La. 1984
    simply mean that such evidence, although admissible to support a "guilty mind", are not alone sufficient to convict.
  • State v. Allen 442 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Williams 438 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Brockington 437 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Korman 439 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Shapiro 431 So. 2d 372 La. 1983
  • State v. Pittman 428 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983