Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Eastin, 419 So. 2d 933.

25 citing documents.

  • State v. Tucker 170 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Montgomery 974 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Thompson 894 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Ellis, 28,282 (La.App.2d Cir.6/26/96), , writ denied, 96-1991 (La.2/21/97), , (La.App.
  • State v. Lattin 870 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, supra; (La.App.
  • State v. Gipson 850 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    See, State v. Eastin State v. Ellis, 28,282, (La.App.
  • State v. Scott 823 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Warren 712 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Ellis 677 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Johnson 595 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Green 590 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Moser 588 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Harris 573 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Wright 535 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Wascom 524 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Banks 503 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. James 499 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Green 478 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    is likewise inapposite because the jury had heard proper or admissible evidence of at least one other burglary and could have inferred that the prosecutor's remark about "these burglaries" referred to evidence of a crime or crimes properly before the jury.
  • State v. Lewis 452 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 447 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Wright 447 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Howard 441 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    you hear today and not let what happened to your daughter in any way influence your verdict in this case.” Defense counsel characterizes this as a “feeble” yes, but it is necessarily a decision for the trial judge whether a yes is “feeble,” inherently unreviewable by an appellate court’s reading of a transcript that says “yes.” We can find no abuse of the discretion that is his
  • State v. Benoit 440 So. 2d 129 La. 1983
  • State v. Brown 432 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Morris 431 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Brogdon 426 So. 2d 158 La. 1983