Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vaughn, 431 So. 2d 763.

116 citing documents.

State v. Price 482 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Serigny 481 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. King 471 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Kirkley 470 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Cureaux 467 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Smith 466 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Accardo 466 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Rogers 462 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Smith 461 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Lockhart 457 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Gaines 452 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Hope 449 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Mason 447 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Coody 448 So. 2d 100 La. 1984
2072, 2076 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969)
State v. Nathan 444 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
A showing of a continuous chain of custody is not essential to the introduction of physical evidence as long as the evidence as a whole establishes that it is more probable than not that the object introduced is the same as the object originally seized by the officer, (La.
State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983