Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bland, 419 So. 2d 1227.
- State v. Baker 471 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Milton 469 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Young 469 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Cureaux 467 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
- State v. Hammer 468 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
State v. Gray
461 So. 2d 389
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
na Supreme Court stated that: “In a multiple offender hearing, only those previous pleas of guilty may be used to enhance a sentence which are supported by a contemporaneous record of a Boykin examination demonstrating the free and voluntary nature of a plea of guilty with an articulated waiver of the constitutional rights required by Boykin v. Alabama.” the Supreme Court found that the State had complied with its burden by the introduction of the minute entry.
-
State v. Beverly
448 So. 2d 792
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
In view of defendant's past criminal record and the lack of any mitigating circumstances, it makes no difference in the instant case whether the offenses for which he was convicted are treated as separate incidents or part of a
-
State v. Antoine
444 So. 2d 334
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
-
State v. Lynch
441 So. 2d 732
La. 1983
2-3) defendant objected to a minute entry as sufficient proof that he had waived his rights.
- State ex rel. Broyard v. Lombard 442 So. 2d 448 La. 1983
-
State v. Murray
436 So. 2d 775
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
However, the court suggests that unless the defense objects to the use of the minutes based on a contention that they are in error, the use of the minutes is appropriate to help establish a prima facie case of a knowing and voluntary waiver of Boykin rights with respect to a previous conviction used for enhance