Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Quimby, 419 So. 2d 951.

129 citing documents.

State v. Norbert 486 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Taylor 485 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Bridges 480 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Burell 476 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
“The law is well settled that the proposed newly discovered evidence must not only be newly discovered but also not discoverable by reasonable diligence before the verdict for it to justify the granting of a new trial.”
State v. Major 476 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Breaux 473 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Nance 469 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Grissom 467 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Elliott 467 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Cook 465 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Sennette 462 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Howard v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 457 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. McLeland 456 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Bourgeois 451 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Phillips 448 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Freeman 447 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
although defendant is not entitled to discover the substance of statements made to a private citizen, on proper motion, defendant is entitled to discover the existence of the oral statement with corresponding information relative to when, where and to whom such
State v. Beridon 449 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Brown 444 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
and State v. Scruggs, 165 La.
State v. Bellows 442 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
the court stated that a defendant who fails to object to the state's response in a motion for discovery, to state clearly for the trial court his basis for complaint, and to request the granting of any of the sanctions afforded by LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Hebert 443 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Jones 433 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Neslo 433 So. 2d 73 La. 1983
State v. Smith 433 So. 2d 688 La. 1983
State v. Trevathan 432 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Banks 428 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Examples of occasional application of the "overwhelming evidence" (La.
State v. Sanders 431 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
where it was held that the failure of a defendant to object to the State's response to a discovery motion, to state the basis for the complaint clearly and to request the trial court to grant any of the remedies afforded by statute for the failure to comply with discovery effectively waives the right to comp
State v. Davis 430 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Ferdinand 465 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Crittenden, 214 La.