Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Raymo, 419 So. 2d 858.

203 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. John Duncan La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
10/24/14), ( (La .1982)).
State of Louisiana Versus Jesse Durant La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
4 Although defendant does not challenge it on appeal, we have considered the sufficiency of the evidence, (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Matthew F. Siekmann La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Jaylon K. Brown La. 2024
On the other hand, the goal is truth and justice, and this court has previously held that when an essential element of a charged offense is lacking, the conviction must be set aside, regardless of how the error is brought to the attention of the reviewing court, (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Daniel Tenner AKA "Danny" AKA "Lil Danny" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Cire Johnson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Terone R Thomas La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
14:52, was considered by this Court, (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Kevin Johnson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
The State contended that Ms. Tappan purchased small amounts of 13 Further, (La.
State of Louisiana v. Wilbur D. Byrd La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisana Versus Dan Robertson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
In the absence of a showing that an identification procedure was suggestive, challenges to the witness’s powers of 10 Nevertheless, (La.
State of Louisiana Versus John W. Patton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Reginald Bradley La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Shineda N. Taylor La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
09/07/82), (sufficiency of the evidence should be considered, regardless of how the error is brought to the attention of the reviewing court, and since the double jeopardy clause prevents retrial when a reversal is based on insufficiency of evidence due to the State’s failure to prove an essential element of the offense, a
State of Louisiana Versus Alcus A. Smith A.K.A. "Bug" A.K.A. "Bull" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Juan Carlos Ramos La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Bobby L. James La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Wayne Norman La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Jontreal A. Fisher La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
3 Regarding counts two and eight, (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Charles R. Lane La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Kyriene Vallery La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Armande S. Tart (Aka Baby, AKA Big Baby, AKA Pop Tart) La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Ron C. Youngblood La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
But, because the verdict for count one was not unanimous, and the instant case is still on direct review we find that, pursuant to Ramos, Defendant is entitled to a new trial on count one.1 1 As part of the errors patent review
State of Louisiana Versus Ivory D. Franklin, II AKA Deuce La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
VACATED; REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL 1
State of Louisiana Versus Aaron Harrell La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
of the evidence, defendant does not contest the sufficiency of the essential statutory elements; rather, he challenges his identity as the perpetrator of the armed robbery and asserts that the State failed to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification.13 13 Even though defendant only challenges one particular element, (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Shawn A. Clark La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Randy Fink La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Nonetheless, we have reviewed the issue of insufficient evidence, (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Emmett Garrison, IV AKA "Lil Emmet" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Jerel Smith La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
A review of the record, (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Steven Rodney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
5 Even though defendant only challenges this one particular element, we note that a (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Cory Bartholomew La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana Versus C. T. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana Versus Kendell Ellis La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. Youngblood 274 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Nonetheless, pursuant to a review under State v. Raymo , , 861 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Ron C. Youngblood La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
Nonetheless, pursuant to a (La.
State v. Blackwell 263 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Nevertheless, a review of the record under State v. Raymo , , 861 (La.
State v. Flag 262 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Nevertheless, a review of the record under State v. Raymo , , 861 (La.
State v. Robinson 260 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
In State v. Raymo , (La.
State v. Dufrene 251 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
But see State v. Raymo , , 859 (La.
State v. Isaac 229 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Stock 212 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
(1982), the Supreme Court held that ”[b]e-cause the state’s case was devoid of evidence of an essential element of the charged offense ,..
State of Louisiana v. Therand Guy Thacker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
When the state‟s case is devoid of evidence of an essential element of the charged offense, the conviction and sentence must be set aside “regardless of how the error is brought to the attention of the reviewing court.”
State v. Thacker 187 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
When the state’s case is devoid of evidence of an essential element of the charged offense, the conviction and sentence' must be set aside “regardless of how the error is brought to the attention of the reviewing court.” State v, Raymo
State v. Fairman 173 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Although defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the elements of the crimes for which he was convicted, we considered the sufficiency of the evidence on our errors patent review and determined that all statutory elements of the crimes for which defendant was convicted have been proven by the State.
State of Louisiana v. Ernest Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Carter 160 So. 3d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/5/12), , writ denied, 13-0039 (La.8/30/13), ().
State v. McClure 169 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
However, we considered the sufficiency of the evidence of Defendant's witness intimidation conviction in our errors patent review and found that all statutory elements of the offense were proven by the State.
State of Louisiana v. Therand Guy Thacker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
When the state’s case is devoid of evidence of an essential element of the charged offense, the conviction and sentence must be set aside “regardless of how the error is brought to the attention of the reviewing court.”
State v. Thacker 157 So. 3d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
When the state’s case is devoid of evidence of an essential element of the charged offense, the conviction and sentence must be set aside “regardless of how the error is brought to the attention of the reviewing court.”
State v. Gayton 158 So. 3d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Thacker 150 So. 3d 296 La. 2014
When the state’s case is devoid of evidence of an essential element of the charged offense, the conviction and sentence must be set aside “regardless of how the error is brought to the attention of the reviewing court.”