DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 418 So. 2d 534.

17 citing documents.

  • State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    The Third Circuit, stated, “[t]he courts of this state have time and again refused to allow prosecutors to exploit a defense counsel’s inattention, omission, or mistake by making repeated and persistent prejudicial comments and references about inadmissible evidence of other crimes of the defendant.” State v. Jackson, 734 So.
  • State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    The Third Circuit, stated, "[t]he courts of this state have time and again refused to allow prosecutors to exploit a defense counsel's inattention, omission, or mistake by making repeated and persistent prejudicial comments and references about inadmissible evidence of other crimes of the defendant."
  • State v. Robinson 784 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Jackson 734 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    : Even though defense counsel did not object to the earlier references to the arrest of the defendant, the fact that the prosecutor made a prejudicial reference to the arrests without objection during questioning does not grant him license to exploit defense counsel's inattention, omission, or mistake by repe
  • State v. Spencer 683 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Boutte 635 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    In the case sub judice, although defense counsel allowed the prosecutor to make three references to the defendant selling crack cocaine before any objection was forthcoming
  • State v. Diaz 635 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Monroe 602 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Jones 588 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Felix 556 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Prestenback 542 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    cited by appellant, in which the Supreme Court of Louisiana reversed an armed robbery conviction because a mistrial was not ordered following the prosecutor’s reference to other crimes.
  • State v. LeBlanc 517 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Morgan 513 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Coleman 499 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Young 480 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Although evidence of a defendant’s prior arrest is never admissible, a defend *437 ant may be impeached by cross examination as to prior convictions when he takes the stand because he then places his credibility in issue.
  • State v. Green 478 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Alexander 430 So. 2d 621 La. 1983