Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Michel, 422 So. 2d 1115.

79 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Christopher Ledet, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Allen Joseph Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Kevin James Alexander -Aka- Kevin J. Alexander -Aka- James K. Alexander -Aka- Kevin Alexander, … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
In support of its argument, wherein the supreme court stated that the term inculpatory statement as set forth in La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Alexander 256 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In support of its argument, the State cites several cases including State v. Michel , wherein the supreme court stated that the term inculpatory statement as set forth in La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Jackson 76 So. 3d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Weaver 873 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
State v. Weber 834 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
P. art. 841; State v. Warner, 93-0216, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Derouselle 769 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Pickrom 732 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson 719 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Schwehm 713 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Matthews 679 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
-21 (La.1982); State v. Grant, 531 So.2d at 1123.
State v. Bowman 677 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
-1121 (La.1982), during rebuttal the prosecutor, "after referring to defense counsel's statement indicating that he (defense counsel) knew that defendant was not guilty, stated, `If he knows ...
State v. Chambers 666 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Guidry 647 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Warner 641 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Fisher 626 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that unresponsive and unsolicited testimony is not chargeable against the State to provide a ground to reverse a criminal conviction; although, it is within the trial court’s discretion to grant a mistrial if it believes that an admonition is insufficient to assure that defe
State v. McLaren 619 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Ducote 614 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Ducote 614 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Clay 612 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Powell 598 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
a state witness who spoke to the defendant on the day of the offense testified he was "under the impression that he [the defendant] shot the guy."
State v. Knowles 598 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Brown 594 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Trahan 576 So. 2d 1 La. 1991
State v. Bobb 573 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Williams 560 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. East 553 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v, Felton, (La.App.
State v. Boyd 548 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Trahan 543 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Harris 540 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Thomas 540 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Grant 531 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Busch 515 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Battista 517 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Johnson 513 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
1st Cir.1983), writ denied, (1983)
State v. Hilburn 512 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Robinson 506 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Bolden 501 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Paul 499 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Newman 491 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Scott 490 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Lewis 489 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. McGuffey 486 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Burge 486 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Thompson 483 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
A search warrant authorizing the search of the “premises” at a stated address must reasonably be interpreted to permit a search of the dwelling house proper and anything in close proximity of the house that one normally associates with the word “house” or “premises.”
State v. Felton 482 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Serigny 481 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hookfin 476 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985