DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jett, 419 So. 2d 844.

120 citing documents.

  • State v. Washington 828 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    1st Cir.1983), writ denied, whether the defendant constitutes an unusual risk of danger to the public, defendant's apparent disregard for the property of others, (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 828 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    1st Cir.1983), writ denied, whether the defendant constitutes an unusual risk of danger to the public, defendant’s apparent disregard for the property of others, (La.App.
  • State v. Louviere 833 So. 2d 885 La. 2002
  • State v. Walker 775 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    1st Cir.1983), writ denied, whether the defendant constitutes an unusual risk of danger to the public, the defendant's apparent disregard for the property of others, (La.App.
  • State v. Coleman 756 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    1983); whether the defendant constitutes an unusual risk of danger to the public, the defendant's apparent disregard for the property of others, (La.App.
  • State v. Hamilton 747 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
    -47 (La.1982) (recognizing that in bifurcated trial proceedings, the initial phase of the trial deals solely with defendant's guilt or innocence).
  • State v. Craig 699 So. 2d 865 La. 1997
    -51 (La.1982) ("There is a well founded legislative policy against a person accomplishing ...
  • State v. Stacy 686 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    1st Cir.), writ denied (1983); whether the defendant poses an unusual risk of danger to the public, the defendant’s apparent disregard for the property of others, (La.App.
  • State v. Young 680 So. 2d 1171 La. 1996
    [6] this court reviewed a sentence for excessiveness that had been imposed under a plea bargain whereby a specific sentence had been agreed upon.
  • State v. Lee 668 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    1st Cir.1983), writ denied, and the viciousness of the crime, (La.
  • State v. Pilcher 655 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Smith 651 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    1st Cir.), writ denied, whether the defendant constitutes an unusual risk of danger to the public; defendant's apparent disregard for the property of others, (La.App.
  • State v. Pickett 628 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    1st Cir.1983), writ denied, and whether the defendant constitutes an unusual risk of danger to the public
  • State v. Strother 606 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    1st Cir.1983), writ denied); the risk of danger to the public ( ); his apparent disregard for the property of others, ( (La.App.
  • State v. Lamark 584 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Vail 571 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Martin 558 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Head 556 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    a defendant may challenge and appeal a sentence imposed pursuant to a plea bargain as excessive.
  • State v. Crocker 551 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Williams 541 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Ferguson 540 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Williams 538 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Bernard 532 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Fabre 525 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Kohl 524 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Bell 524 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    the defendant agreed to plead guilty and *842 accept consecutive life sentences for two murders in exchange for the prosecution’s agreement not to seek the death penalty.
  • State v. Harris 520 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Duhon 512 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    2 Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Jenkins 508 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Lambert 503 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Mitchell 498 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Lutes 496 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Gaudin 493 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Tzuanos 491 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Rious 490 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Dawson 490 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Chance 487 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Sonnier 487 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Green 480 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Lee 478 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Cox 474 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    citing with approval State v. Martin, supra.
  • State v. Lawson 474 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Atley 470 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State Ex Rel. Turner v. Maggio 463 So. 2d 1304 La. 1985
    For a history of this statutory scheme
  • State v. Roberts 463 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 459 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    the Supreme Court acknowledged the rule it had adhered to, but then reviewed the sentence anyway.