Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Elaire v. Blackburn, 424 So. 2d 246.

211 citing documents.

  • State v. Montgomery 734 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • State v. DeSilva 726 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    9 2 ; State v. Bowman, 95-0667 p. 10, fn.
  • State v. President 715 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Parker 711 So. 2d 694 La. 1998
  • State v. Riser 704 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    states: [i]f the defendant does not enter an objection (at a time when the trial judge can correct the error), then the reviewing court may affirm the conviction if the evidence would have supported a conviction of the greater offense, whether or not the evidence supports the conviction of the legislati
  • State v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Neville 695 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. White 695 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Stacy 686 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Cortez 687 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Bowman 677 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    certiorari denied 461 U.S. 959 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Green 673 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Campbell 670 So. 2d 1212 La. 1996
  • State v. Carrier 670 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Tatum 661 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Culverson 653 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Porter 639 So. 2d 1137 La. 1994
  • State v. Serio 641 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State ex rel. A.V. 637 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Stelly 635 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Leon 623 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Moten 619 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Brown 619 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Wright 598 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Brown 591 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Clark 589 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Myers 584 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
    cert, denied, Elaire v. Blackburn, 461 U.S. 959 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. English 582 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Munoz 577 So. 2d 1009 La. 1991
  • State v. Munoz 577 So. 2d 1009 La. 1991
  • State v. Greco 575 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Camp 571 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Kalathakis 563 So. 2d 228 La. 1990
    (Dennis, J., dissenting), in my opinion, due process requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every element of an offense before a person may be convicted and punished.
  • State v. Weiland 562 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Magouirk 561 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Holland 544 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Sheldon 541 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Griffin 540 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Charbonnet 536 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Lewis 529 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Moorehead 524 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Schrader 518 So. 2d 1024 La. 1988
  • State v. Prince 520 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Schrader 506 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Redfearn 504 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Boyd 503 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Darby 502 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    rehearing denied, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: "It is important to distinguish between those responsive verdicts which are lesser and included grades of the charged offense and those responsive verdicts which are not lesser and included offenses but are nevertheless included in La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Montgomery 499 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    for the standard of sufficiency of evidence to responsive verdicts.
  • State v. Lovick 498 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    the court held that where the defendant fails to object to the trial court’s failure to exclude a responsive verdict which would not be supported by the evidence, the defendant cannot complain on appeal from that verdict, provided the evidence produced on trial would have supported a conviction for the charg
  • State v. Washington 484 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986