Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. LaFleur v. Donnelly, 416 So. 2d 82.

94 citing documents.

State v. Jones 691 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
the court held that, in addition to an explanation of the rights a defendant is waiving by pleading guilty and of the elements of the offenses with which he is charged, it is much more important that the defendant understand the maximum penalty exposure.
State v. Fields 686 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
(wherein defendant attacked his guilty plea by way of post conviction relief and established his misunderstanding of when he would be eligible for parole and that he would not have pled guilty had he known he would be ineligible for probation or parole).
State v. Pichon 684 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Hamilton 677 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Cassels 669 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Hunter 662 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Anderson 661 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. King 639 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Lapoint 635 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
the court noted that although it is important to explain to the accused the elements of the offenses with which he is charged and the rights he is waiving by pleading guilty thereto, "it is probably much more important to the defendant's decision (about whether to plead guilty) that he understand the ma
State v. Monroe 635 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Griffin 633 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
(wherein the defendant attacked his guilty plea by way of post conviction relief and established his misunderstanding of when he would be eligible for parole and that he would not have pled guilty had he known he would be ineligible for probation or parole).
State v. Bradford 627 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Maloney 625 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Medine 623 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
*114 (wherein the defendant attacked his guilty plea by way of post conviction relief and established his misunderstanding of when he would be eligible for parole and that he would not have pled guilty had he known he would be ineligible for probation or parole).
State v. LaGarde 618 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the court vacated the defendant’s sentences which were more severe than what he had been led to believe.
State v. Carter 619 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Whitley 615 So. 2d 1335 La. 1993
State v. Rivers 614 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Murphy 613 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the Court vacated the defendant’s guilty pleas and sentences due not to the failure of the State to live up to a plea bargain, but rather due to the fact that by operation of law the defendant’s sentence was more severe than what he had been led to believe it would be.
State v. Carriere 611 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Harris 601 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
(wherein the defendant attacked his guilty plea by way of post conviction relief and established his misunderstanding of when he would be eligible for parole and that he would not have pleaded guilty had he known he would be ineligible for probation or parole).
State v. Harris 601 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
LaFleur, v. Donnelly, (wherein the defendant attacked his guilty plea by way of post conviction relief and established his misunderstanding of when he would be eligible for parole and that he would not have pled guilty had he known he would be ineligible for probation or parole).
State v. Franklin 599 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Smith 599 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Wientjes 586 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. McFarland 578 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Nabors 569 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Combs 567 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Potts 554 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Williams 554 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Watts 550 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Smith, supra; (La.App.
State v. Whitaker 543 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Jones 537 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Young 535 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Graham 513 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Buckenburger, supra.
State v. Champagne 506 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Celestine 493 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 682 La. 1984
(note 2, Lemmon, J., concurring.)
State v. Dixon 449 So. 2d 463 La. 1984
State v. Louis 446 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State Ex Rel. Curry v. Guillory 441 So. 2d 204 La. 1983
State v. Haney 434 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Hayes 423 So. 2d 1111 La. 1982
State ex rel LaFleur *1113 State ex rel.