Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Southeastern Louisiana University v. Shelton, 431 So. 2d 432.

37 citing documents.

Harris v. Eysink 97 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2 Cir. 10/31/84); (La.App.
Woods v. Cameco Industries, Inc. 815 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 5/12/99), ; (La.App.
ConAgra Broiler Co. v. Gerace 657 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Landry v. Shell Oil Co. 597 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Sensley v. Administrator, Office of Employment Security 552 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Sensley v. ADM'R, OFFICE OF EMP. SEC. 552 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Thibodeaux v. Rosewood Nursing Home 551 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
McDonald's Sherwood Forest, Inc. v. Administrator, Department of Employment Security 540 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
App. 4th Cir. 1984); (La.App.
Lewis v. Administrator 540 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Const. of 1974, art. V, § 10(B); (La.App.
Franklin v. Whitfield 534 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Moore v. Whitfield 531 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
5th Cir.1987) the court set out the well settled standards for reviewing a Board of Review decision, as follows: “A (La.App.
Eugene v. Adm'r, Div. of Emp. SEC. 525 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Ray v. Whitfield 521 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Johnson v. Whitfield 521 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Elsey v. State Department of Employment Security 517 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Gunn v. Gerace 516 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Guidry v. Administrator, Office of Employment Security, Department of Labor 520 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
23:1634 provides: “In any proceeding under this section the findings of the board of review as to the facts, if supported by sufficient evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of the court shall be confined to questions of law.” (La.App.
Dupont v. Blanche 514 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Bentley v. Blache 508 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Gray v. Blache 493 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
23:1692 and said: “ — nor, should they be assessed against the Department, (La.App.
Germany v. STATE, OFFICE OF SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 493 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Thigpen v. Administrator, Office of Emp. SEC. 488 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Banks v. Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security 488 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Credit v. Whitfield 488 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Gleason v. Blache 487 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Jantzen of Louisiana, Inc. v. Blache 486 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Although no medical expert testified, (La.App.
O'NEAL v. Blanche 482 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Const. of 1974, art. V, § 10(B); (La.App.
Melton v. State, Office of Employment SEC. 473 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Hayes v. State, Office of Employment SEC. 467 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Billman v. Sumrall 464 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Jantzen of La., Inc. v. Blache 464 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Thibodeaux v. Louisiana Office of Employment Security 458 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Chalik v. Gerace 459 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Jefferson Parish HU v. State O. of Emp. SEC. 458 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
La. Dept. of Corr. v. Admin., La. OES 457 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Louisiana Department of Corrections v. Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security 457 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Wilkerson v. State, Office of Employment SEC. 439 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by