Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ruple, 426 So. 2d 249.

15 citing documents.

Criticized State v. Green 691 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Hicks 554 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Driggers 554 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Although the state must prove specific intent in order to convict defendant of indecent behavior with juveniles, (La.App.
State v. Roberts 541 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. O'NEAL 501 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Ester 490 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Bahm 490 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Ford 467 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Art. 5, § 10(B); (La.App.
State in Interest of Cox 461 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Norman 448 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Korman 439 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
See, concurring opinion of Judges Covington, (La.App.
State v. Gatson 434 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
In this regard, I (La.App.
State v. Kohler 434 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
[3] Indeed, for an interesting analysis of the scope of this court's appellate review in criminal cases, (La.App.
State, in Interest of Racine 433 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
[2] See, however, the special concurring opinion of Judges Covington, (La.App.
State v. Oliney 430 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
See the Specially Concurring opinion, (La.App.