Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lewis, 430 So. 2d 1286.

155 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Allen Clayton Fulks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    4 Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. O'Shay Devan Hicks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Thomas Calvin Henson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenny Roy Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Young 270 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    4th Cir.1986) ; the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Walter Urena La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Urena 215 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Simpson 186 So. 3d 195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Robinson 163 So. 3d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    4th Cir.1986)); the harm done to the victims ( (La.App.
  • State v. Craft 162 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Herrington 152 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Tillman 104 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Moton 73 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Bobo 77 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    4 Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.
  • State v. Nelson 25 So. 3d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Sumlin 25 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Boudreaux 21 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    4th Cir. 1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Boudreaux 21 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    4th Cir. 1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Pierre 5 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Brunet 5 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Gene Mitchell Olivier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. AUGUILLARD 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Russell J. Auguillard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, State v. Lewis, 20 (La.App.
  • State v. TURKS 997 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS HECTOR LEYVA-MARTINEZ AKA HECTOR L. MARTINEZ AKA HECTOR LEYVA AKA HECTOR LAZARO LEYVA MARTINEZ La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Leyva-Martinez 981 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Harris 966 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    4th Cir. 1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 962 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Parker 963 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. McDUFFEY 960 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    4th Cir. 1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Demarco D. Hawkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    4th Cir. 1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Hawkins 956 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Boudreaux 945 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    4th Cir. 1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Karl Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Thibodeaux 924 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Caston 914 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Gatti 914 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    4th Cir. 1986); • the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Dagenhart 908 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Hopkins 908 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    App. 4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Asad 870 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dillon James Merritt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Merritt 875 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Hampton 865 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    4 Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Jarrett 862 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    App. 4th Cir.1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Howard 842 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    4th Cir.1986)]; the harm done to the victims [ (La.App.
  • State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    4th Cir. 1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4th Cir. 1986); the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 828 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    4th Cir.1986), the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 828 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    4th Cir.1986), the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. James 813 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    I respectfully disagree with the rationale of the majority in Sepul-vado for the reasons set forth hereinabove and for the additional reasons and authorities cited in the excellent concurring opinion of Judge (now Chief Judge) Carter written on behalf of Judges Lottinger, -1293 (La.App.