Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite LeBlanc v. Opt, Inc., 421 So. 2d 984.
-
Richard Le v. Nitetown, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
In the absence of some equitable or other good reason, costs generally follow the final judgment in favor of the prevailing party.” LeBlanc v. Opt., Inc., (La.App.
-
Le v. Nitetown, Inc.
72 So. 3d 374
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In the absence of some equitable or other good reason, costs generally follow the final judgment in favor of the prevailing party.” LeBlanc v. Opt., Inc., (La.App.
-
Wooley v. Lucksinger
14 So. 3d 311
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Le-Blanc v. Opt, Inc., (La.App.
-
Donavan v. Jones
658 So. 2d 755
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
LeBlanc v. Opt, Inc., (La.App.
-
Holt v. Automotive Casualty Insurance Co.
626 So. 2d 528
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
LeBlane v. Opt, Inc., (La.App.
-
Broussard v. Delchamps, Inc.
571 So. 2d 855
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
LeBlanc v. Opt, Inc., (La.App.
-
Joeffroy v. Succession of Arceneaux
507 So. 2d 1281
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
LeBlanc v. Opt, Inc., (La.
-
McFarland v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc.
502 So. 2d 593
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
3rd Cir.1984); LeBlanc v. Opt, Inc., (La.
-
Johnson v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.
476 So. 2d 1074
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1974); LeBlanc v. Opt, Inc., (La.App.
-
Chin v. Roussel
456 So. 2d 673
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
4th Cir.1982); LeBlanc v. OPT, Inc., (La.App.
-
American Deposit Ins. Co. v. Walker
450 So. 2d 33
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Leblanc v. Opt, Inc., (La.App.
-
Tinney v. W.J. Tessier Realtors, Inc.
447 So. 2d 1099
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
4th Cir.1982), and Le Blanc v. Opt, Inc., (La.App.
-
Perry v. Al George, Inc.
428 So. 2d 1309
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
LeBlanc v. Opt, Inc., (La.App.
-
LeBlanc v. Opt, Inc.
427 So. 2d 438
La. 1983
Although the lower courts' conclusion that the corporate veil should be pierced is extremely doubtful from the facts contained in the court of appeal opinion, , relator admits that Opt, Inc. has substantial assets in excess of the amount awarded LeBlanc.
- LeBlanc v. Opt, Inc. 429 So. 2d 132 La. 1983