Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Amos, 422 So. 2d 605.

17 citing documents.

Smith v. State Dept. of Health & Hospitals 895 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 11/17/97) ; (La.App.
Succession of Majoue 705 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Civ.Code, Art. 471; (La.App.
Kanz v. Wilson 703 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Guidry v. Dufrene 687 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Poirier v. Poirier 664 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Arnold v. Fenno 652 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Brown v. Brown 635 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Thus, because no legally contemplated delivery ever occurred, even if the funds used to purchase the certificates of deposit are considered corporeal movables (since cash is treated as a corporeal movable), (La.App.
Moore v. Gibbens 620 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
4th Cir.1984); and (La.App.
Carter v. Carter 538 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Succession of Daroca 536 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Succession of Fralick v. Secretary of the Department of Revenue & Taxation 529 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Succession of Hemelt 523 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
The trial judge relied upon the decision in
Succession of Taglialavore 490 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
4th Cir. 1984); (La.App.
Succession of Velasquez-Bain 471 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Succession of Danese 459 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
In Re Tutorship of Werling 459 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Financial Corp. v. Estate of Cooley 447 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984