Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 448 So. 2d 645.

190 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Courtland E. King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Danny Trey Crossland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Marcel N. Dugar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
” Thus, we will consider the nature of Defendant’s crime, his background, and the sentences imposed in similar circumstances.
State of Louisiana v. Jaleel Green La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Detron Devon Lambert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Larry Delanta Gardner, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State v. Manning, supra; (La.
State of Louisiana v. Dewey Glenn Burnworth, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Trivual A. Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Amos 192 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Ingram La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Ingram 181 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Barbain 179 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Jasper, infra ( *788 478 (La.1982); ).
State v. Wilson 165 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Jasper, supra ( (the district court need not recite the entire checklist of article 894.1, but the record must reflect that it adequately considered the guidelines)).
State v. Jasper 149 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(the trial court need not recite the entire checklist of article 894.1, but the record must reflect that it adequately considered the guidelines).
State v. Boudreaux 98 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
(the trial court need not recite the entire checklist of article 894.1,but the record must reflect that it adequately considered the guidelines).
State v. Thornton 83 So. 3d 1024 La. 2012
This Court has consistently held that Miranda warnings are not required when the law officer is making a general, on-thej5eene5 investigation to determine whether there has been the commission of a crime, and, if so, by whom.” (citations omitted); see, e.g., State v. Shirley, 08-2106, pp. 8-10 (La.5/5/09), -30 (Miranda warnings not required to admit defendant’s statements following an accident in which she flipped her car and killed her passenger that she did not see a stop sign and had had “two
State of Louisiana v. Wendell Joseph Bienvenu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Denna L. Decuir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Decuir 61 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Materre 53 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 894.1); (the trial court need not recite the entire checklist of article 894.1, but the record must reflect that it adequately considered the guidelines).
State v. Bell 23 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
art. 894.1); (the trial court need not recite the entire checklist of article 894.1, but the record must reflect that it adequately considered the guidelines).
State v. Shirley 10 So. 3d 224 La. 2009
-652 (La.1984); -1167 (La.1981), dissent at ; cert.
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
-652 (La.1984); -1167 (La.1981), dissent at ; cert.
State v. Anders 820 So. 2d 513 La. 2002
State v. Mitchell 808 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Scott 780 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Smith 775 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Premier Games, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. PUBLIC SAFETY 761 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
49:953(B), which the Division alleges was not effective until June 29, 1995, to the emergency rules adopted by the Division on February 10, 1995; and (2)
State v. Jones 731 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Distinguished State, in Interest of Hlf 713 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Boyd 710 So. 2d 1074 La. 1998
State v. Byrd 708 So. 2d 401 La. 1998
State v. Behrnes 706 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Salat 672 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Smith 672 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Domangue 649 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Smith 639 So. 2d 237 La. 1994
and authorities cited therein.
State v. Thomas 639 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
The standard of review of a statute which is alleged to be overly broad in its scope is whether the choice of sanctions of lawfully regulated activity infringes upon the exercise of protected freedoms.
State v. Walker 637 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Bennett 623 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Pontiff 604 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Hookfin 602 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Union Tank Car Co., supra; State v. Dousay, supra
State v. Holiday 598 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Chatman 599 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Battieste 597 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Jones 596 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Willis 591 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Davis 584 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Davis 584 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Lamark 584 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991