Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hammond v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York, 419 So. 2d 829.

101 citing documents.

Mona Leblanc v. Walmart Distribution Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Leroy Johnson v. Lofton Staffing Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Michael Thibodeaux v. St. Mary Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
3/ 11/ 94), - 68, citing Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. ofNew York, ( La.
Debra S. Lenox v. Central Louisiana Spokes, LLC D/B/A Renegade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Lenox v. Cent. La. Spokes, LLC 265 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Summers v. Ritz-Carlton New Orleans 171 So. 3d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Guevara v. Brand Energy & Infrastructure Services, Inc. 129 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Billy Wayne Broadway v. Shane Mitchell Logging, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Broadway v. Shane Mitchell Logging, Inc. 105 So. 3d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Doyle v. City of New Orleans Police Department 46 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hammond v. Fidelity & Cos. Co. of New York
Joseph Simpson v. Lafayette Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Mr. Simpson relies on Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, -33 5 (La.1982) (footnote omitted), wherein the supreme court explained the difference between the concepts of legal causation and medical causation, stating: [The lower courts] failed to distinguish the “medical” meaning of cause from the “legal” meaning
Simpson v. Lafayette Consolidated Government 29 So. 3d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Mr. Simpson relies on Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, -33 (La.1982) (footnote omitted), wherein the supreme court explained the difference between the concepts of legal causation and medical causation, stating: [The lower courts] failed to distinguish the “medical” meaning of cause from the “legal” meaning of cause.
Charles McKelvey, Jr. v. City of Dequincy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
McKelvey v. City of Dequincy 970 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Mitchell v. Alliance Compressors 926 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
*132 App. 2 Cir.1990) (citing Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, and Duncan v. State, DOTD, (La.App.
Linda F. Mitchell v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
App. 2 Cir. 1990) (citing Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, and Duncan v. State, DOTD, (La.App.
Payne v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 929 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Doucet v. Baker Hughes Production Tools, 93-3087 (La.3/11/94), -68 , citing Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
Samuel A. Daenen v. the Cajun Landing Restaurant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Daenen v. Cajun Landing Restaurant 899 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Lee v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America 900 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Thomas v. Proctor & Gamble—Louisiana Folger Coffee 875 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Doucet, at 167-168; citing Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
Wilkerson v. City of New Orleans Fire Dept. 871 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Cynthia M. Smith v. M. Randall Comeaux, D.D.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Smith v. M. Randall Comeaux, D.D.S. 857 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Friedley v. Alexander Electrical, Inc. 836 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Doucet , 93-3087 at 3, 635 So.2d at 167 -168 (citing Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, ).
Dawson v. City of Slidell 804 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Walton, 475 So.2d at 325 ; Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
White v. Fresenius Medical Care 801 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Thompson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 786 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Doucet, supra at 167-168 ; citing Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
Beverly v. Boardwalk Const. 771 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
at 324-25 ( citing Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, -32 (La.1982); Haughton v. Fireman's Fund American Ins.
Olander v. Schillileagh's 759 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, -33 (La.1982), the supreme court discussed the difference between these two terms: |iaWhen the doctors speak of cause they are essentially speaking of etiology — the origin of disease; what initially causes a disease.
McGaughey v. City of New Orleans 695 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Co., Haughton v. Fireman's Fund American Ins.
Lafrance v. Custom Built Torque Convertors 694 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Rhoto v. La. Transmission Parts 670 So. 2d 1388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Walton v. Normandy Village Homes Association, Inc., supra; Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, Haughton v. Fireman’s Fund American Ins.
Wooley v. EJD Builders, Inc. 668 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
at 324-25 (citing Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, -32 (La.1982); Haughton v. Fireman's Fund American Ins.
Cochennic v. Dillard's Dept. Store Warehouse 668 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Co., the court discussed the weight of medical evidence thusly: ...
Gers v. National Tea Co. 656 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Pitre v. Oilfield Production Contractors 651 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Co., Haughton v. Fireman's Fund American Ins.
Hurst v. St. Anthony Nursing Home 650 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Tate v. L & a CONTRACTING 643 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Doucet v. Baker Hughes Production Tools, (La.1994), -68 (quoting Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, ).
Willis v. Dry Creek Nutrition Services 640 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, Duncan v. State, DOTD, (La.App.
Mitchell v. Abbeville General Hosp. 635 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Co. of New York, as follows: A plaintiff-employee's disability will be presumed to have resulted from an employment accident if before the accident the plaintiff-employee was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves, provided that the
Haley v. Beall-Ladymon Corp. 634 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, (La.
Penny v. Avondale Container Service 636 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
at 324-25 (citing Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, -32 (La.1982); Haughton v. Fireman's Fund American Ins.
Doucet v. Baker Hughes Production Tools 635 So. 2d 166 La. 1994
Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
Quinones v. US Fidelity and Guaranty Co. 630 So. 2d 1303 La. 1994
Co. of New York, noted that the plaintiff in a death benefits case bears the burden of proving, by a reasonable preponderance of the evidence, that a causal relationship existed between the employment accident and the death.
Peveto v. WHC Contractors 630 So. 2d 689 La. 1994
at 324-25 (citing Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, -32 (La.1982); Haughton v. Fireman's Fund American Ins.
Doucet v. Baker Hughes Production Tools 626 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Duncan v. State, DOTD, (La.App.
Lavergne v. Lake Charles Memorial Hosp. 625 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Walton v. Normandy Village Home Ass'n, Inc., and Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York
Quinones v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 617 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Blanque v. City of New Orleans 612 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993