Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Malek v. Yekani-Fard, 422 So. 2d 1151.

28 citing documents.

Bailey v. Khoury 891 So. 2d 1268 La. 2005
In further support of their position, stands for the proposition that prescription on a claim for in utero injuries to an unborn child begins before the child's birth.
Bailey v. Khoury 868 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
In Re McLarrin 865 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Bailey v. Khoury 840 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
YOLANDA v. Robert 775 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
v. Guillory, supra ; see also Malek v. Yekani-Fard, [ ]
State v. Taylor 769 So. 2d 535 La. 2000
State ex rel. Jackson 757 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Neisler 633 So. 2d 1224 La. 1994
-31 (La.1981) (collecting cases)
STATE, DSS v. Williams 605 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State, Department of Social Services, Office of Family Support ex rel. Smith v. Williams 605 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Smith v. Jones 566 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Lamana v. LeBlanc 558 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
In Re Adoption of BGS 556 So. 2d 545 La. 1990
1989) (recognizing obligation of natural father to provide support for natural child despite child's presumed legitimate filiation with another man); (recognizing inheritance rights of natural children despite their presumed legitimate filiation with another); (recognizing possibility of mother proving child's filiation to a man other than her husband); Adoption of Baby Doe, (La.App.
Smith v. Cole 553 So. 2d 847 La. 1989
1985), rehearing den.; [the mother's "marital status is irrelevant except for any weight it may have at trial in proving or disproving filiation.
Starks v. Powell 552 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
the Louisiana Supreme Court allowed a mother to bring an action on behalf of her unborn child to filiate with the alleged biological father despite the fact that the mother had a legal husband.
Smith v. Cole 541 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
In a recent case involving filiation, the Louisiana Supreme Court held: "It is argued that this mother has a legal husband.
Lamana v. LeBlanc 526 So. 2d 1107 La. 1988
State ex rel. Department of Health and Human Resources v. Hinton 515 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HHR v. Hinton 515 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Turner v. Rochelle 490 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Alex v. Heirs of Alex 479 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
1974), to the extent that those cases allowed proof of filiation regardless of the mother's marital status."
Griffin v. SUCCESSION OF BRANCH EX REL. SMITH 479 So. 2d 324 La. 1985
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES v. Williams 471 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Art. 209, as it is presently amended, to the extent that those cases allowed proof of filiation regardless of the mother's marital status.
Finnerty v. Boyett 469 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Thomas v. Smith 463 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
In a relatively recent decision, the Louisiana Supreme Court, made the following pronouncement: "It is argued that this mother has a legal husband.
Durr v. Blue 454 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Malek v. Yekani-Fard 451 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Jefferson 448 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by