Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Entrevia v. Hood, 427 So. 2d 1146.

299 citing documents.

Jordan Jones Favret v. John Favret, Kathy Favret, Justin Phipps Boyce, and Madison Gallo Boyce La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Faith in Farming Company, L.L.C. v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development Consolidated with … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Anna L. Pistorius v. Higbee Louisiana, LLC, d/b/a Dillard's La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Brittany Cavet v. Abc Insurance Company and Maison St. Charles, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Gerald Bercy v. 337 Brooklyn, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Ferguson v. Am. Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co. 273 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In Entrevia v. Hood , (La.
Boutall v. Christakis, P.M., Co. 236 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Broussard , 113 So.3d at 175 (citing Entrevia v. Hood , , 1148-49 (La.
Falcon v. Surcouf 236 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
Broussard , 113 So.3d at 175 (citing Entrevia v. Hood , , 1148-49 (La.
Cox v. Baker Distrib. Co. 244 So. 3d 681 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Entrevia v. Hood , , 1148-49 (La.
Robert Schram v. Colony Speciality Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Williams v. ABC Insurance Co. 209 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Id., 113 So.3d at 183 (-49 (La.
Nugent v. Car Town of Monroe, Inc. 206 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Broussard v. State, supra
Waddles v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 181 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
A determination of whether a thing presents an unreasonable risk of harm should be made “in light of all relevant moral, economic, and social consideration.”
Hooper v. Brown 171 So. 3d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Guerrero v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 165 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Russell, supra; Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Dowdy v. City of Monroe, 46,693 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
Tramuta v. Lakeside Plaza, L.L.C. 168 So. 3d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Russell v. Morgan's Bestway of Louisiana, LLC 113 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Dowdy, supra.
Broussard v. State ex rel. Office of State Buildings 113 So. 3d 175 La. 2013
-49 (La.1983); Olsen, 365 So.2d at 1292 .
Scherer v. PNK (Bossier City), Inc. 112 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Dowdy, supra.
Flenner v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 110 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
McClelland v. City of Shreveport 108 So. 3d 810 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Rather, the determination of whether a thing presents an unreasonable risk of harm should be made “in light of all relevant moral, economic, and social considerations.” Id., citing Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95)
Franatovich v. St. Bernard Parish Government 88 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Boyle, 685 So.2d at 1083 3 ; Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corp., 258 La.
Patrick E. Phillips v. G & H Seed Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Brooks v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation & Development 74 So. 3d 187 La. 2011
McGee v. Mutter 67 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Patrick E. Phillips v. G & H Seed Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Phillips v. G & H SEED CO. 66 So. 3d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Arlene Chambers v. Village of Moreauville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Celestine v. Union Oil of Cal., 94-1868 (La.
Chambers v. Village of Moreauville 60 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Celestine v. Union Oil of Cal., 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
Pearson v. DELAUNE 54 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Burns v. CLK Investments V, L.L.C. 45 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
MILLIEN v. Jackson 30 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance 23 So. 3d 259 La. 2009
Murphy v. City of New Orleans 25 So. 3d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Patrick E. Phillips, Jr. v. G & H Seed Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Phillips v. G & H Seed Co., Inc. 10 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Jean B. Richard, Jr. v. Anna Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Ann Welch v. State of La., Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
The Cowboy Connection, Inc. v. State of La., Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
McCoy v. Liberty Mut. Life Ins. Co. 956 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Terri Louise Smith v. Boise Cascade Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Buchignani v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 938 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
Granda v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 935 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Pat Swido and Tommie Swido v. Lafayette Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The determination as to the existence of an unreasonable risk of harm is made using a risk/utility analysis, which should be made “in light of all relevant moral, economic and social considerations.”
Swido v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 916 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Degges v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 911 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
She further cites a balancing test that courts have developed for determining whether or not a particular condition is “unreasonably dangerous.” the court stated, inter alia: [I]t has been suggested that a useful approach in a case under article 2317 might be to ask the following: If the custodian of the thing is presumed to have knowledge of its condition before plaintiffs injury, would he then have been acting reasonably by maintaining it and expo
Lafayette Parish School Board v. Darlene M. Cormier, on Behalf of Her Minor Child, Jade Cormier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Lafayette Parish School Bd. v. Cormier 901 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Law v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. 909 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Andrus v. LAD CORP. 875 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by