DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Indus. Sand and Abrasives v. L. & NR Co., 427 So. 2d 1152.

128 citing documents.

  • Grant v. OUACHITA NAT. BANK 536 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Industrial Sand & Abrasives, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville RR Co., et al
  • Bank of Lafayette v. Bailey 531 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Industrial Sand and Abrasives, (La.App.
  • Fremin's Food & Furniture, Inc. v. Teche Electric Cooperative, Inc. 533 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Sand and Abrasive v. L & N R. Co., : “La.C.C.P.
  • Van Matre v. Teche Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 532 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Industrial Sand and Abrasives
  • Bourgeois v. Jordan 527 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Industrial Sand and Abrasives, , at pages 1153, 1154 (La.
  • Smith v. Howard Steel Erection, Inc. 534 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Industrial Sand and Abrasives, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.
  • Dixon v. Perlman 528 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Austin v. Pascarelli 522 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Industrial Sand and Abrasives, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.
  • Weems v. Hickman 524 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Industrial and Abrasives, , at pages 1153, 1154 (La.1983) discussed the law of this state and the criteria to be applied in determining whether or not a summary judgment should be granted.
  • Toole v. Tucker 519 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Industrial Sand and Abrasives, Inc. v. Louisville and Nashville RR Co., et al
  • Wilhite v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. 517 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    : The sole purpose for the motion for summary judgment is to determine in advance of trial whether a genuine issue of material fact exists between the litigants.
  • Williams v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. 516 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Industrial Sand and Abrasives, Inc. v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, et al.
  • Bares v. Stone Oil Corp. 510 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Summary judgment law in this state was explained by our Supreme Court in Industrial Sand and Abrasives, : "La.C.C.P.
  • St. Cyr v. Catherine's Stout Shoppe 505 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Industrial Sand and Abrasive, at 1154-55 (La., 1983) discussed the criteria to be utilized in determining whether to grant summary judgment: The sole purpose for the motion for summary judgment is to determine in advance of trial whether a genuine issue of material fact exists between the litigants.
  • Barham & Churchill v. Campbell & Associates 503 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    4th Cir.1985) quoting Industrial Sand and Abrasives, Inc. v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, et al, -54 (La.1983).
  • Kirkpatrick v. Great Central Life Insurance Co. 490 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    As the Supreme Court stated in Industrial Sand and Abrasives, : “La.C.C.P.
  • Hills v. American Waste & Pollution Control Co. 488 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Industrial Sand and Abrasives, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.
  • Bickham v. Orleans Parish School Board 488 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Industrial Sand and Abrasives, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.
  • Whitney Nat. Bank of New Orleans v. Poydras Center Associates 487 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Industrial Sand and Abrasive, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.
  • Gregoire v. AFB CONST., INC. 478 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Industrial Sand and Abrasives
  • Hemphill v. State Farm Ins. Co. 472 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    In Industrial Sand and Abrasives, the Louisiana Supreme Court made the following comments regarding the law on motions for summary judgment: "The sole purpose for the motion for summary judgment is to determine in advance of trial whether a genuine issue of material fact exists between the litigants.
  • Green v. DeFelice 466 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    3rd Cir.1984) by stating: "In Industrial Sand and Abrasives, at 1153 (La.1983), the Supreme Court reiterated the following standards for reviewing a summary judgment: `The sole purpose for the motion for summary judgment is to determine in advance of trial whether a genuine issue of material fact exists between the litigants.
  • Pisarello v. Administrator's Service Corp. 464 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    at 1153-1154 (La., 1983).
  • Holmes v. St. Charles General Hosp. 465 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    In the recent Louisiana Supreme Court decision of Industrial Sand and Abrasives, Inc. v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, et al, at 1153-54 (1983), the issue of summary judgment was discussed: The sole purpose for the motion for summary judgment is to determine in advance of trial whether a genuine issue of material fact exists between the litigants.
  • Sosa v. Chandler Machine Co. 459 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    In the case of Industrial Sand and Abrasive, Inc. v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, et al., at 1154-1155 (1983) that Court stated: The sole purpose for the motion for summary judgment is to determine in advance of trial whether a genuine issue of material fact exists between the litigants.
  • Stone Oil Corp. v. Acadiana Consulting & Inv. 448 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • Concrete Post-Tensioning v. Armco, Inc. 449 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    In Industrial Sand and Abrasives, at 1153 (La.
  • Gela v. Hamdan 446 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Art. 966; Industrial Sand and Abrasives, Thornhill v. Black, Sivalls and Bryson, Inc.