Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 452 So. 2d 685.

76 citing documents.

Sandra Parnell Versus Kai Nealey and Citi Trends, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
1989), citing Brown v. Winn–Dixie Louisiana, Inc., (La.
Dickerson v. Winn-Dixie, Inc. 816 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1 Cir. 1982), rev'd on other grounds
Smith v. Toys" R" US, Inc. 754 So. 2d 209 La. 1999
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Valley v. Specialty Restaurant Corp. 726 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
McCardie, 511 So.2d at 1135 (quoting Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., ).
Holden v. STATE UNIV. MED. CENTER 690 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
1st Cir.1982), rev'd on other grounds
Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 655 So. 2d 309 La. 1995
Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 645 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Duckett v. Kmart Corp. 645 So. 2d 621 La. 1994
In Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., the evidence established procedures almost identical to those described by Collins in this case.
Breaux v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 635 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
Marshall v. Sam's Wholesale Warehouse, Inc. 626 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
substance on the store’s floor caused the plaintiff to fall and sustain injury, the burden of proof shifts to the “store operator [who] is required to prove that his employees did not cause the hazard, and that he exercised such a degree of care that he would have known under most circumstances of a hazard caused by customers.” McCardie, supra at 1135 , citing Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Braud v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. 618 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., Estes v. Kroger Company, 556 So.2d at 243 .
Perez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 608 So. 2d 1006 La. 1992
Compare Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Thibodeaux v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 608 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Davis v. Wal-Mart, Inc. 594 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Marshall v. a & P Food Co. of Tallulah 587 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific 583 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Crandell v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 580 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Hall v. Petro of Texas, Inc. 580 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., Estes v. Kroger Company, supra .
Lane v. American Dairy Queen, Inc. 571 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
McCardie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Brown v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Eugene v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 570 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
9:2800.6 parallels the existing jurisprudence of Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., regarding plaintiff's burden of proof.
Crowther v. Kmart Corp. 568 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Laborde v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 563 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Elizabeth v. Clearview Supermarket 562 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
See Brown v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
LeBlanc v. Alton Ochsner Medical Found. 563 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Barnes v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 561 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
1 The McCardie court, relying on its prior holding in Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., held that, in a slip and fall case, the plaintiff must first prove that a foreign substance on the store’s floor caused him to fall.
Matthews v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets Inc. 559 So. 2d 488 La. 1990
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Pilet v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 559 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Brown v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., Core v. Winn Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
Estes v. Kroger Co. 556 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Brown v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc.
Matthews v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 555 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Morgan v. Stanley Stores, Inc. 550 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
1987); Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Cascio v. Continental Casualty Co. 547 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Brown v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc., citing Gonzales v. Winn Dixie Louisiana Inc., supra; Blanchard v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarket, Inc., supra.
Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 546 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., (La.App.
Bonnette v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 542 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Perron v. Ambassador Ins. Co. 541 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 539 So. 2d 1212 La. 1989
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Doming v. K-Mart Corp. 540 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., Saucier v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Incorporated, supra .
Ratliff v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 538 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
McCardie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Brown v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 535 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
The Louisiana Supreme Court further added to the store owner's burden in Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., in which the court stated: [1, 2] The critical effect of the partial shifting of the evidentiary burden was the virtual elimination of proof of actual or constructive knowledge as an element of plaintiff's case.
Hall v. K-Mart Department Store No. 7386 534 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Appellant feels it met its burden of proof as spelled out in Brown v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc., which does not require a defendant store to produce virtually every employee who may have caused a spill.
Brown v. Schwegmann's Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 534 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
McCardie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., *1346 Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., Smith v. Winn-Dixie Stores of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
Holden v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 532 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
The slip and fall cases, Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., and Kavlich, v. Kramer, as well as the protruding object cases, (La.App.
Dickson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 535 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
See Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 527 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., (La.
Miller v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. 527 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., (La.
Rutledge v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 523 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
That case relied heavily on two cases that the Court had previously decided Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., (La.
Raymond v. Safeway Stores, Inc. 522 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
the court summarized that under the new evidentiary burden, the store operator is required to prove that his employees did not cause the hazard and that he exercised such a degree of care that he would have known under most circumstances of a hazard caused by customers.
Zeagler v. Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc. 521 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
McCardie, supra, citing Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Zenon v. K-Mart Corp. 525 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
With reference to the defendant’s burden of proof in such cases, our Supreme Court stated in Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., at pages 686-687: “The critical effect of the partial shifting of the evidentiary burden was the virtual elimination of proof of actual or constructive knowledge as an element of plaintiff’s case.
Thomas v. K-Mart Corp. 525 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
With reference to the defendant's burden of proof in such cases, our Supreme Court stated in Brown v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., at pages 686-687: "The critical effect of the partial shifting of the evidentiary burden was the virtual elimination of proof of actual or constructive knowledge as an element of plaintiffs case.
McCardie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 511 So. 2d 1134 La. 1987
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.