Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Culp v. Belden Corp., 432 So. 2d 847.

55 citing documents.

Kelley v. Louisiana Limestone Aggregates, Inc. 630 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
our Supreme Court reiterated the standard of review as follows: On appellate review, the trial court’s factual findings concerning work-related disability should be given great weight and should not be disturbed where the evidence before the trier of fact supports a reasonable factual basis for the trial co
DeFatta v. General Motors Corp. 605 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Borne v. Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc. 595 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Peck v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. 586 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Culp v. *718 Belden Corp.
Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc. 573 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Manson v. City of Shreveport 577 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Jones Construction Company
Villagomez v. Howard Trucking Co. 569 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Hill v. LJ Earnest, Inc. 568 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Broussard v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co. 562 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Estopinal v. National Tea Co. 545 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
DeGruy v. Pala, Inc. 525 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Duhon v. Acadiana Transmissions 517 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Crawford v. Midwest Steel Co., Inc. 517 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Culp v. Belden Corp., *921 Martin v. H.B.
Jackson v. Georgia Cas. and Sur. Co. 513 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Chance v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 509 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Harris v. Halliburton Co. 501 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Notto v. MORTON-NORWICH PROD. INC. 498 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Knight v. General Acc. Ins. Co. 496 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Dugas v. J.A. Jones Construction Co. 491 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Walker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 488 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Wall v. Sisters of Charity of Incarnate Word 488 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
: On appellate review, the trial court's factual findings concerning work-related disability should be given great weight and should not be disturbed where the evidence before the trier of fact supports a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's findings, unless clearly wrong.
Thompkins v. Sewell Plastics, Inc. 487 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
: “ * * * [I]n compensation situations where pain is the linchpin to make out a prima facie case for a worker’s classification in the odd lot category, the pain accompanying routine physical tasks and attempts to return to work must be substantial, serious, intense and/or severe.
Barry v. Western Elec. Co., Inc. 485 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Co. of N. America, supra; Martin v. H.B.
Baum v. Dick Henley, Inc. 484 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Deaville v. J.B. Talley & Co. 482 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
App. 3rd Cir.1982), writ granted, affirmed, (La.
Jones v. Kentucky Fried Chicken 483 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Westley v. Pressure Services, Inc., supra; Latiolais v. Home Ins.
Miller v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. 480 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
the Supreme Court held that to make a prima facie case of substantial pain, the claimant must prove that the pain is "substantial, serious, intense, and or severe."
Stablier v. Big T Welding Supply Co. 479 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Culp v. Belden Cor *421 poration
Clement v. Scaffolding Rental & Erection Services, Inc. 480 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Green v. Louisiana Coca Cola Bottling Co., Ltd. 477 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Smith v. Ranger Insurance Co. 476 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Venable v. Rawlings, Inc. 471 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Rodney v. Crown Zellerbach Corp. 470 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Lanus v. Gulf Wandes Corp. 470 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Gibson v. Hayes Oilfield Const. Co. 467 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Brown v. Mount Carmel Academy of New Orleans, Inc. 468 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Singleton v. Bushnell & Co., (La.App.
Williams v. Western Preferred Cas. Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Kilgore v. Western Cas. & Sur. Co. 462 So. 2d 1366 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
LaPrarie v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 463 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Lemoine v. Employers Cas.
Miller v. E.M. Babst Co. 459 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
(La.1983) and Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc. 457 So. 2d 646 La. 1984
3d Cir. 1982), aff'd, Daney v. Argonaut Ins.
Smith v. Union Underwear, Inc. 457 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Latiolais v. Home Ins. Co. 454 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Cupit v. Amax Nickel, Inc. 454 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Holland v. TG & Y. STORES 451 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Peck v. TG & Y STORES CO. 451 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Crisp v. Southern Silk Screen, Inc. 451 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Young v. Hercules, Inc. 451 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Gales v. Dresser Industries, Inc. 444 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
reviewed in detail the basis for determining when a worker is partially disabled due to pain.
Millet v. Hooker Chemical Co. 442 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
In determining whether the trial court erred, at page 851: “On appellate review, the trial court’s factual findings concerning work-related disability should be given great weight and should not be disturbed where the evidence before the trier of fact supports *1241 a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s findings, unless clearly wrong.” (Citat

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by